Baseball Fever  

Go Back   Baseball Fever > National League > Washington Nationals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2006, 07:00 PM
wilkerson_rulz-06's Avatar
wilkerson_rulz-06 wilkerson_rulz-06 is offline
iMac/BBFTG mod
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,369
Let's just hope...

Let's hope that our grapefruit record will not reflect 2006

Nationals 1-10-1

*jumps out of window*
__________________
Cristobal
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2006, 08:20 PM
efin98's Avatar
efin98 efin98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Revere, MA
Posts: 4,056
Spring Training records usually are nothing- Kansas City had the best record one year, and look at them!

Any standings that has Tampa Bay ahead of the Nats is bogus.
__________________
Best posts ever:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nymdan View Post
Too... much... math... head... hurts...
Quote:
Originally Posted by RuthMayBond View Post
I understand, I lost all my marbles years ago
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2006, 08:37 PM
KingJ's Avatar
KingJ KingJ is offline
Western fan of the East
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,479
Grapefruit league is hardly a reflection of anything. We use a lot of scrubs in these games and look who has the best record (Marlins are 8-2)
__________________
The Q: Can the Cubs hold a 6-5 lead with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th?

The A: No

***********My Rant on Bud Selig***********
Selig is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Selig and a pigeon is that Selig intends to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture,
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2006, 11:12 AM
538280's Avatar
538280 538280 is offline
Prophet of Rage
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 11,576
Nothing to be worried about. Spring Training records mean nothing. The Expos actually had the best Spring Training record in 2004.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2006, 12:38 PM
vasprtsfn vasprtsfn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilkerson_rulz
Let's hope that our grapefruit record will not reflect 2006

Nationals 1-10-1

*jumps out of window*
Remember that they have 6 players away from the team in the WBC right now. Besides, remember that ST isnt about wins and losses. Its about the players working out the kinks, loosening up, and getting back into game shape, so that when April 3 rolls around, they are ready for action.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2006, 12:52 PM
wilkerson_rulz-06's Avatar
wilkerson_rulz-06 wilkerson_rulz-06 is offline
iMac/BBFTG mod
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by vasprtsfn
Remember that they have 6 players away from the team in the WBC right now. Besides, remember that ST isnt about wins and losses. Its about the players working out the kinks, loosening up, and getting back into game shape, so that when April 3 rolls around, they are ready for action.
I know, but still let's hope.

*eats a hot-dog and chokes on it*
__________________
Cristobal
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:06 PM
eddiejc1's Avatar
eddiejc1 eddiejc1 is offline
Edward J. Cunningham
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 684
Folks, we all know what happened this offseason. It is far more
likely we will sleeping with the Fishes than flying with the Braves
and Mets this year. We are and should not be content with losing,
but if we are true Nats fans, we have to be prepared to stick with
our team win or lose.

Eddie Cunningham

P.S. BTW, Wilk---there's something about Mark Lerner that you will definitely like (assuming he will be the new owner)---he's a
minority owner of the Washington Capitals!
__________________
20 20

Finally---something Nats and Birds fans can agree on!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:07 PM
vasprtsfn vasprtsfn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 245
Except that Ted Lerner is the ownership candidate for the Nationals.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:14 PM
wilkerson_rulz-06's Avatar
wilkerson_rulz-06 wilkerson_rulz-06 is offline
iMac/BBFTG mod
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiejc1
P.S. BTW, Wilk---there's something about Mark Lerner that you will definitely like (assuming he will be the new owner)---he's a
minority owner of the Washington Capitals!
Then bring him on!
I hope he become our owner! (It's obvious as to why.)

P.S I am not a Caps fan, only Ovechkin fan!
__________________
Cristobal
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:23 PM
Bob Hannah's Avatar
Bob Hannah Bob Hannah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by vasprtsfn
Except that Ted Lerner is the ownership candidate for the Nationals.
What Eddie says bears much merit. Should Ted Lerner get the team, son Mark will be quite involved in it's operation. Then look for Mark to take the reins in the years to come.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:28 PM
eddiejc1's Avatar
eddiejc1 eddiejc1 is offline
Edward J. Cunningham
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Hannah
What Eddie says bears much merit. Should Ted Lerner get the team, son Mark will be quite involved in it's operation. Then look for Mark to take the reins in the years to come.
I was under the mistaken impression that Mark Lerner was
going to be the owner. (Probably because it was Mark, and
not Ted, who was spotted talking with Trader Jim last week.)
Still, we should brace ourselves for the fact that we probably
won't be as good in 2006 as we were for most of 2005. However,
this year we should be able to make a few moves late in the
season. But there were will so much to do with the new stadium,
MASN, and marketing the team, that I don't think trying to make
a pennant run should be our top priority.

Eddie Cunningham
__________________
20 20

Finally---something Nats and Birds fans can agree on!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:36 PM
RedSoxVT92's Avatar
RedSoxVT92 RedSoxVT92 is offline
Smokey Joe
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,099
Spring training is just a bunch of exhibition games played by minor leaugers trying to make the roster. The star players just fool around, its like a vacation sort of. Its only important to pitchers who have to get there arm ready for the year. But Spring training records has no effect on the regular season.
__________________
go sox.

Pigskin-Fever

Last edited by RedSoxVT92; 03-12-2006 at 01:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2006, 01:58 PM
eddiejc1's Avatar
eddiejc1 eddiejc1 is offline
Edward J. Cunningham
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 684
We just dropped another one, so let's hope our regular season record is a little better. BTW, since Wilk has taken liberties with the Nats' and Expos' logos, I've decided to do the same with the Habs' famous CH!

Eddie Cunningham
Attached Images
File Type: gif header_main.gif (2.5 KB, 24 views)
__________________
20 20

Finally---something Nats and Birds fans can agree on!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Copyright © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Part of the
Baseball Almanac family: 755 Home Runs | Baseball Box Scores | Football Almanac | Pigskin Fever | Today in Baseball History.