![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
ESPN:Some big-time suprises and comments on Soriano
MUST READ!!
Bold Is key words. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2352752 Quote:
__________________
Cristobal Last edited by wilkerson_rulz-06; 03-03-2006 at 06:52 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Soriano has created a real logjam do you think it likely he'd sit out rather than play?
If he throws a big enough tantrum will the Gnats Terrell Owens him? Or should they just move him now to a team like the Mets for anything with a pulse?
__________________
The Phillies Barstool Lives! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Buffet Option
Quote:
I don't think he'd sit out, he becomes an FA after this season. (The guy lost his arbitration but still wound up making 2.5 mil more than last year. He certainly isn't worth the ten million in my book.) If he does sit he hurts himself bigtime for next season-maybe. I'm certain the guy would be more than happy to play 2B for any team that really wants to lay down many millions for his subpar defensive services. All he would need to do is smile and say "I'm not a problem child outfielder, I'm a second baseman." He would be happy as a clam, professing love for his new team because that team would play him in his chosen position. He hasn't done enough (yet) to TeeOh him. The way I see it, Frank Robby may tell him to take left field. If Soriano refuses, it would give the Nats better grounds to try and not pay him. Maybe the guy jumps the team, an even stronger basis not to pay. Down side is the Nats lose Wilky, Sledge and minor leaguer for...not having to pay Soriano $10 mil? I don't know all the legalities of MLB contracts, but if D.C. could get out of it by not paying out $10 million if Sori sits, this may be the team's best case scenario. Keep Vidro. Probably isn't the player he once was. '05 showed he wasn't recovered from the '04 injury year. So we fall back to compare to his '03 season, the last full year. This is three years removed for that time via injury. Lots of questions there. Vidro is a team guy, Robbly is still around but Bowden as GM doesn't have the ties to Vidro the Expo that Minaya had. That being said, trading Vidro to the Mets does't seem implausible. Nats lose all around-Wilky, Vidro, Sledge, Soriano after this season, for...what? Unknown roster fillers. The National (Bowden) certainly went into this blind assuming Soriano would take up left field. The Nats come out looking bad in this one no matter how you cut it. Merciful malignancies, can you say clubhouse cancer? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|