Baseball Fever  

Go Back   Baseball Fever > General Baseball > Ballparks, Stadiums & Green Diamonds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2005, 09:24 AM
RottenGazebo's Avatar
RottenGazebo RottenGazebo is offline
Team Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Flint area
Posts: 505
best playing field/worst playing field

What field do you think had the best playing field? Worst?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2005, 02:38 PM
sschirmer's Avatar
sschirmer sschirmer is offline
100 years is long enough!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,026
Based on my MLB playing experience of exactly zero games, I'd have to say that I have no idea.
__________________
I'm a Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech and a Hell of an Engineer!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2005, 06:23 PM
JPL BMX's Avatar
JPL BMX JPL BMX is offline
SF Giants
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: US
Posts: 53
I'd say for soccer it would probaly be that Nike Turf I think it's called. For football if you like the flat and not muddy ground Nike Turf is the best, if it's raining during a football game you always have to go with grass in my mind. For baseball it's grass and only grass. Artificial Turf for baseball is horrible. Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:07 PM
steveox's Avatar
steveox steveox is offline
Team Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 764
Best field would have to be Old memorial stadium in baltimore.The Worst is old comiskey park.Cause when the orioles played the sox in chicago after a rain delay back in 1979 the field was in terrable shape had to be postponed because they had disco night 10 days ago.I cant find that pic but boy i was upset when i turned my TV on as the umpires were looking all over the field and decided to call the game.I said to myself,,Im glad we dont have the worst groundscrew in baltimore.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2005, 02:44 AM
Solair Wright's Avatar
Solair Wright Solair Wright is offline
Cardinals and MLB fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,385
The best playing field is definately Fenway Park, mostly because from what I saw during the season, it's easy to get runs by hitting the CF wall. Worst is probably the Metrodome or some stadiums that currently are multi-purpose stadiums (both holds Football and Baseball). (Busch Stadium used to have football games)

Why? Because the playing field is awkward compared to natural baseball stadiums, and you get seats that are meant for football or whatever sport.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2005, 08:40 AM
bluejaysfan's Avatar
bluejaysfan bluejaysfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 101
Alot of the cookie-cutter parks had brutal turfs. A bad one was certainly the old one at Olympic Stadium. Alot of football players have gotten bad injuries on that turf as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2006, 10:18 PM
Gjm130's Avatar
Gjm130 Gjm130 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejaysfan
Alot of the cookie-cutter parks had brutal turfs. A bad one was certainly the old one at Olympic Stadium. Alot of football players have gotten bad injuries on that turf as well.
Hey!!!! lil Blue Jay Fan, your precious Skydome wasn't any better......
And by the way, Montreal got FieldTurf in 03, Toronto had it in 04.....
Whose ballpark has the worse playing field now, loser?

Remember The EXPOS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-14-2006, 07:53 AM
sschirmer's Avatar
sschirmer sschirmer is offline
100 years is long enough!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gjm130
Hey!!!! lil Blue Jay Fan, your precious Skydome wasn't any better......
And by the way, Montreal got FieldTurf in 03, Toronto had it in 04.....
Whose ballpark has the worse playing field now, loser?

Remember The EXPOS
Dude, not too sure I'd be throwing smack at someone, when my city couldn't even keep it's team.
__________________
I'm a Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech and a Hell of an Engineer!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-14-2006, 12:17 PM
wamby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gjm130
Hey!!!! lil Blue Jay Fan, your precious Skydome wasn't any better......
And by the way, Montreal got FieldTurf in 03, Toronto had it in 04.....
Whose ballpark has the worse playing field now, loser?

Remember The EXPOS
Probably Montreal's since no one is playing on it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-14-2006, 08:25 PM
Sean O Sean O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gjm130
Hey!!!! lil Blue Jay Fan, your precious Skydome wasn't any better......
And by the way, Montreal got FieldTurf in 03, Toronto had it in 04.....
Whose ballpark has the worse playing field now, loser?

Remember The EXPOS
God, you're a massive tool.

If you bothered to know anything about the game, you would know that Montreal sold the fieldturf after the Expos left. But, that would just get in the way of you being an idiot, and we can't have that.

Stade Olympique is completely devoid of any aesthetic value whatsoever. Hopefully some day you'll get out of your pathetically ugly city of Montreal to understand that.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-14-2006, 08:49 PM
Elvis's Avatar
Elvis Elvis is offline
Team Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,223
For those interested in what the most recent MLB players poll said...

Which ballpark has the best-quality playing field?

Dodger Stadium 23.2%
Angel Stadium 11.2%
Safeco Field 9.5%
Oriole Park at Camden Yards 5.7%
Kauffman Stadium 5.1%

Which has the worst?

Wrigley Field 17.5%
Fenway Park 17.1%
Olympic Stadium 13.0%
Shea Stadium 9.7%
Metrodome 9.3%

550 MLB players participated in this poll

Source: Sports Illustrated/CNN

Last edited by Elvis; 01-15-2006 at 01:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-15-2006, 09:29 PM
Gjm130's Avatar
Gjm130 Gjm130 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschirmer
Dude, not too sure I'd be throwing smack at someone, when my city couldn't even keep it's team.
Try to take our 1994 perfect season away from us with a strike.
Try to sell our team to an idiot like Jeffrey Loria who sold the franchise to the MLB a year later.
Try to make us believe that we were about to have a new baseball venue in the downtown area and never build it.
Give us a closed roof in summer when it's about -40 degrees celcius in winter.
Don't even try to give us a TV deal. We only got 20 games per season on TV.

Look, I have nothing against you. I just hate those Blue Jay fans enjoying the fact that Montrealers were unfortunate the past few years.
__________________
REMEMBER THE EXPOS
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-15-2006, 09:35 PM
E.Banks#14's Avatar
E.Banks#14 E.Banks#14 is offline
Hall of Fame is a shame
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burbs of ChiTown
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis9045
For those interested in what the most recent MLB players poll said...

Which has the worst?

Wrigley Field 17.5%

550 MLB players participated in this poll

Source: Sports Illustrated/CNN
I'll bet that that the dugout, clubhouse, parking, and bathroom situations had more to do with that than did the actual playing field.
__________________
A lot of people say this honor validates my career, but I didn't work hard for validation. I didn't play the game right because I saw a reward at the end of the tunnel. I played it right because that's what you're supposed to do, play it right and with respect. If this validates anything, it's that learning how to bunt and hit and run and turning two is more important than knowing where to find the little red light at the dug out camera. - Ryne Sandberg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-15-2006, 09:39 PM
Gjm130's Avatar
Gjm130 Gjm130 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean O
God, you're a massive tool.

If you bothered to know anything about the game, you would know that Montreal sold the fieldturf after the Expos left. But, that would just get in the way of you being an idiot, and we can't have that.

Stade Olympique is completely devoid of any aesthetic value whatsoever. Hopefully some day you'll get out of your pathetically ugly city of Montreal to understand that.
Hey, I've been a long time season ticket holder. And I have to admitt that this Olympic Stadium wasn't the field of dreams for us. It was the crapiest stadium in the whole MLB. People hated it here. It looked like a deformed spaceship. I took the time to get you pictures of the proposed downtown venue in Montreal. (Which was never built).
Brochu Park.jpg

Brochu Park 2.jpg

Labatt Park.jpg
__________________
REMEMBER THE EXPOS
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-16-2006, 10:10 AM
sschirmer's Avatar
sschirmer sschirmer is offline
100 years is long enough!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gjm130
Try to take our 1994 perfect season away from us with a strike.
Try to sell our team to an idiot like Jeffrey Loria who sold the franchise to the MLB a year later.
Try to make us believe that we were about to have a new baseball venue in the downtown area and never build it.
Give us a closed roof in summer when it's about -40 degrees celcius in winter.
Don't even try to give us a TV deal. We only got 20 games per season on TV.

Look, I have nothing against you. I just hate those Blue Jay fans enjoying the fact that Montrealers were unfortunate the past few years.
I guess I don't quite understand the politics of what happened. You keep saying "give us" and "make us". Didn't Expos fans have something to do with all this? I know that Loria wasn't the greatest owner up there, but heck, he did win a title in FL. At any rate, I think the Vet had a worse playing surface than the O did anyway.
__________________
I'm a Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech and a Hell of an Engineer!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-16-2006, 12:29 PM
RottenGazebo's Avatar
RottenGazebo RottenGazebo is offline
Team Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Flint area
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by E.Banks#14
I'll bet that that the dugout, clubhouse, parking, and bathroom situations had more to do with that than did the actual playing field.
Nah, probably that ivy.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-16-2006, 03:13 PM
E.Banks#14's Avatar
E.Banks#14 E.Banks#14 is offline
Hall of Fame is a shame
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burbs of ChiTown
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenGazebo
Nah, probably that ivy.
It's not the ivy that players don't like, it's what's behind it --- a brick wall.
__________________
A lot of people say this honor validates my career, but I didn't work hard for validation. I didn't play the game right because I saw a reward at the end of the tunnel. I played it right because that's what you're supposed to do, play it right and with respect. If this validates anything, it's that learning how to bunt and hit and run and turning two is more important than knowing where to find the little red light at the dug out camera. - Ryne Sandberg
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-16-2006, 04:04 PM
Gjm130's Avatar
Gjm130 Gjm130 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschirmer
I guess I don't quite understand the politics of what happened. You keep saying "give us" and "make us". Didn't Expos fans have something to do with all this? I know that Loria wasn't the greatest owner up there, but heck, he did win a title in FL. At any rate, I think the Vet had a worse playing surface than the O did anyway.
Actually, in the 80s and early 90s, we drew like 28 000 average attendance. People were coming to see games. But all hell broke loose when Bud Selig announced that the 94 season was not going to be played because of a strike. The Expos were 84-30 in the 1994 season (1st in the league). People here just gave up and never wanted to come to a baseball game after the 94 season anymore.
Well, some hardcore Expo fans remained (like me). But they just weren't enough.
__________________
REMEMBER THE EXPOS
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-16-2006, 06:20 PM
sickle's Avatar
sickle sickle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 83
They gave up because they weren't TRUE baseball fans. How many real baseball fans did you know of before the strike that don't still love the game and support it? Where I'm from (northeastern PA), people drive for hours to go to games in Philly, New York, Boston, and Pittsburg to see games. We love our baseball. How many people from Montreal make that kind of commitment, even now without a team?

My market does have minor league ball (the Scranton Wilkes-Barre Red Barons, AAA club of Philly, for one more year). When Philly goes in another direction and gets a team in Allentown, we will be filling Lackawanna County Stadium with a tenant before one fan can bat an eye over losing our beloved Barons.

Real baseball fans will never, and I mean NEVER give up on the game.
__________________
www.bwbl.net
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-16-2006, 10:10 PM
Gjm130's Avatar
Gjm130 Gjm130 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickle
They gave up because they weren't TRUE baseball fans. How many real baseball fans did you know of before the strike that don't still love the game and support it? Where I'm from (northeastern PA), people drive for hours to go to games in Philly, New York, Boston, and Pittsburg to see games. We love our baseball. How many people from Montreal make that kind of commitment, even now without a team?

My market does have minor league ball (the Scranton Wilkes-Barre Red Barons, AAA club of Philly, for one more year). When Philly goes in another direction and gets a team in Allentown, we will be filling Lackawanna County Stadium with a tenant before one fan can bat an eye over losing our beloved Barons.

Real baseball fans will never, and I mean NEVER give up on the game.
You're right...But I know that the MLB screwed Montreal by not letting us have our new downtown stadium. The fans should have come even though they had to go to that crappy old Olympic Stadium.

The same situation is happening right now with the Marlins. They struggled to get a new stadium deal and their attendance average is sinking down the toilet. It went from 26 000 to 19 000. You can see the differance.

Could you even believe that the Expos had no ownership. No TV deal. No new stadium. Nothing. How could the fans follow baseball like that.

And the Phillies, on the other hand, have good ownership a bran new stadium, succsesful team, TV deals, (You haven't been screwed)....
I heard the ballpark is far from downtown Philadelphia....is that true???
And where do you think the Marlins will land by the year 2009?
__________________
REMEMBER THE EXPOS
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-17-2006, 05:53 PM
sickle's Avatar
sickle sickle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 83
Just wanted to clarify that we are "screwed" in the fact that we are losing our beloved Red Barons.

CBP is right next to Lincoln Financial Field (home of the Eagles). I have not yet been to CBP, but I have been to Lincoln Financial, and walking by, CBP looks really nice (can't see inside, though). It is in a nice area some distance from downtown, so it's not in a bad location at all!

I would like to see a team in Vegas. Some people think they can't support a team, but I think they are wrong. Vegas is the fastest growing city in the country; it could support the nation's greatest game. The 51s might lose some, but MLB would benefit, in my opinion.

There are also the people who are concerned with the gambling aspect of it, but Vegas would have no more control over them than they would over any other team, PROVIDED casino owners and their "boys" would have no ownership in it whatsoever -- bring in someone from out of state.


Other than Vegas, and possibly the Carolinas (and even there, they have the developmental leagues), I don't know if there is another market that can support a big-league team.


Just my two pennies.
__________________
www.bwbl.net
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-13-2008, 05:32 PM
Seattle1's Avatar
Seattle1 Seattle1 is offline
Mariners
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
For those interested in what the most recent MLB players poll said...

Which ballpark has the best-quality playing field?

Dodger Stadium 23.2%
Angel Stadium 11.2%
Safeco Field 9.5%
Oriole Park at Camden Yards 5.7%
Kauffman Stadium 5.1%

Which has the worst?

Wrigley Field 17.5%
Fenway Park 17.1%
Olympic Stadium 13.0%
Shea Stadium 9.7%
Metrodome 9.3%

550 MLB players participated in this poll

Source: Sports Illustrated/CNN
Didn't they put a whole new playing surface in at Wrigley for 2008? Maybe that's why the Cubs did so well (in the regular season anyway)!

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-13-2008, 05:50 PM
jimmyjimjimz jimmyjimjimz is offline
Tucker Max is God
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,004
Best field:
Yankee Stadium

Worst field:
Fenway Park
Wringley Field
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-13-2008, 06:15 PM
soup soup is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle1 View Post
Didn't they put a whole new playing surface in at Wrigley for 2008? Maybe that's why the Cubs did so well (in the regular season anyway)!

yes. They totally removed the old playing surface. They actually found the anchors for the old goal posts when they removed the dirt and re-graded the field. They put in a modernized drainage system, eliminating the big "crown" that used to make some parts of the field not visible from the dugout. I agree, it used to be one of the worst surfaces in the majors, and disease in the bluegrass made the outfield pretty spotty in mid to late summer. Since the new field was installed, I think Wrigley is on par with a lot of parks in the midwest
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-13-2008, 09:43 PM
marlins739's Avatar
marlins739 marlins739 is offline
Chris Coghlan for ROTY
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 466
I wonder how the field at Dolphin Stadium compares to some of the others. I'm sure it gets much worse during football season, especially now that the Miami Hurricanes play there too, but I'm convinced we have the best grounds crew in the majors. Dealing with the downpours and the field conversions and keeping it always looking good is a tall order. It's the only major league field I've ever walked on before, and it sure looks nice up close. By comparison, some of the other parks always have dead spots in the summer
__________________
1993 1997 2003 2012
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Copyright © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Part of the
Baseball Almanac family: 755 Home Runs | Baseball Box Scores | Football Almanac | Pigskin Fever | Today in Baseball History.