Baseball Fever  

Go Back   Baseball Fever > General Baseball > Ballparks, Stadiums & Green Diamonds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2005, 05:09 PM
redlegsfan21's Avatar
redlegsfan21 redlegsfan21 is offline
4th Place or Bust
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 3,625
Blog Entries: 7
Tale of Two Busch Stadiums

I thought this was a nice picture.

And here is a goodbye to Busch

So long Busch Stadium, I will always miss you.
__________________
Unlike most other team sports, in which teams usually have an equivalent number of players on the field at any given time, in baseball the hitting team is at a numerical disadvantage, with a maximum of 5 players and 2 base coaches on the field at any time, compared to the fielding team's 9 players. For this reason, leaving the dugout to join a fight is generally considered acceptable in that it results in numerical equivalence on the field, and a fairer fight.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:48 PM
jrh31584's Avatar
jrh31584 jrh31584 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 228
Didn't think they would be able to take it down that fast.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2005, 11:08 PM
ElCaminoSS's Avatar
ElCaminoSS ElCaminoSS is offline
My fracture= Seasons over
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Hills, California
Posts: 648
Wow I didnt know you could see the arch from the stadium
__________________
Born True Blue
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2005, 11:27 PM
Elvis's Avatar
Elvis Elvis is offline
Team Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,223
Check this out
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2005, 11:30 PM
ElCaminoSS's Avatar
ElCaminoSS ElCaminoSS is offline
My fracture= Seasons over
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Hills, California
Posts: 648
Great site
__________________
Born True Blue
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2005, 09:42 AM
64Cards's Avatar
64Cards 64Cards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrh31584
Didn't think they would be able to take it down that fast.
An exception to the rule around here, most road construction projects usually come in at LEAST a year behind schedule.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:39 PM
Yankeebiscuitfan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wonder how they will be in time for the start of the 2006 season? To me it seems like they have a LOT to do until they can finish the construction.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2005, 05:54 PM
efin98's Avatar
efin98 efin98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Revere, MA
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by yankees rule
I wonder how they will be in time for the start of the 2006 season? To me it seems like they have a LOT to do until they can finish the construction.
I'm guessing here but I wouldn't be surprised if the stadium utilized alot of prefabricated sections to cut down on costs and time. Looks like things will be mostly done in the next month or two with the grass going down in about February.
__________________
Best posts ever:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nymdan View Post
Too... much... math... head... hurts...
Quote:
Originally Posted by RuthMayBond View Post
I understand, I lost all my marbles years ago
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2005, 09:35 PM
POLO GROUNDS 1957's Avatar
POLO GROUNDS 1957 POLO GROUNDS 1957 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DETROIT MI
Posts: 2,280
busch stadium

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrh31584
Didn't think they would be able to take it down that fast.
You are right i cant believe that the stadium is almost gone in such a short time, but they have been working around the clock with the demolishion.i guess this makes up for seeing sportsman park torn down in 1966. another cookie cutter bites the dust.
__________________
LONG LIVE THE POLO GROUNDS 1891-1964
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/POLOGROUNDS1962
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2005, 04:01 AM
redlegsfan21's Avatar
redlegsfan21 redlegsfan21 is offline
4th Place or Bust
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 3,625
Blog Entries: 7
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
12/07/2005

Fireworks celebrate the demolition of Busch Stadium.
(Laurie Skrivan/P-D)

ST. LOUIS

At about 12:24 a.m. today, the last remaining section of Busch Stadium came tumbling down to the cheers and honks from a crowd of onlookers. The occasion was marked by a hail of fireworks set off from the middle of the construction site.

By the time the last piece came down, many of the people who braved the cold temperatures to say goodbye had already left. But some families stayed until the very end.

"I've been going to games since I was months old," said Ryan Fall, 19, of Ellisville. "I just had to stay until the end."

A construction worker passed out pieces of concrete to Fall and a few others minutes after the last section came down.

"He's kind of like Santa Claus," Fall said of the construction worker.

By midnight, the crowd of onlookers had dwindled down to a few dozen parked cars. Several people got out of their cars to snap pictures as the wrecking ball brought down each arched section. By 12:20 a.m., just two of the famed arches remained.

Workers still have several weeks of clearing rubble and grading to make way for new the Busch Stadium, rising just to the south.

Earlier Wednesday night, the streets around the old stadium were lined with cars with engines idling to keep occupants warm while watching the demolition. Some braved the temperatures to take pictures - with cameras and camera phones.

All day, fans made pilgrimages to record final glimpses. And for about 20 minutes at lunchtime, a few even slipped through a temporary gap in the security fence along Walnut Street to grab pieces of broken concrete and twisted steel.

"What a great way to go Christmas shopping," said Mary Miller of St. Louis, as she walked away with pockets and arms filled with baseball-sized chunks of Busch concrete.

It was a free and unsanctioned version of "Fredbird's Garage Sale" - the pricey sale of stadium memorabilia held last month. One scavenger jumped from an idling pickup, hefted a bowling-ball-size chunk of concrete from the site, dropped it into the truck and drove away.

A few minutes before 1 p.m., an irritated laborer arrived to shoo the dozen or so souvenir-seekers from the site.

Doug Inman of Florissant got away just in time with a 4-foot section of thick reinforcing rod slung across his right shoulder.

"I dropped by to take pictures - and got a bonus," he said.

The demolition began Nov. 7 and was six weeks ahead of schedule by Wednesday night. The last section standing was from the northern curve of old Busch.

Roger Kent, work site chief for Ahrens Contracting Inc., said the around-the-clock operation brought down the structure faster than expected.

"It was a combination of putting extra equipment on the job and having good people doing it," Kent said.

Officially, Ahrens has until June 28 to complete demolition, clearing and grading. The first order of business was to make way for the new stadium and an extension of Clark Avenue.

The new stadium is supposed to be ready by April 10, when the Cardinals host the Milwaukee Brewers in the home opener.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new...2?OpenDocument
__________________
Unlike most other team sports, in which teams usually have an equivalent number of players on the field at any given time, in baseball the hitting team is at a numerical disadvantage, with a maximum of 5 players and 2 base coaches on the field at any time, compared to the fielding team's 9 players. For this reason, leaving the dugout to join a fight is generally considered acceptable in that it results in numerical equivalence on the field, and a fairer fight.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-09-2005, 01:30 PM
Sean O Sean O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 910
I'm torn about the new park. On one hand, the design itself is horrible, completely devoid of any interesting elements other than tired retreads of neoclassicism. But on the other hand, the cantilevering of the upper decks is extremely welcome considering how far upper decks have been pushed from the field recently.

I guess i'm not really sure why they bothered tearing down the old one. I mean, yeah it had been one of the ugly clones, but the latter-day transformation into a baseball-only park made it a comparatively beautiful place. The accessibility is the exact same, only in the new park there are less seats for the Cardinals' frequent post-season games.

I'm just not sold on new Busch being needed, when the Cardinals sell out virtually every game as it is. At least if they were pushing the boundaries of neoclassicism or attempting a different style it'd be one thing, but the design leaves much to be desired.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2005, 06:58 PM
Chisox73's Avatar
Chisox73 Chisox73 is offline
Thunderstruck!
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Munster, Indiana
Posts: 7,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCaminoSS
Wow I didnt know you could see the arch from the stadium
The stadium is only 3 blocks away from the Arch.It's really closer than it looks.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-07-2007, 01:11 PM
cards_252
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Pictures of Old Busch Stadium

No longer available.

Last edited by cards_252; 06-05-2007 at 09:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:24 PM
RichardLillard1 RichardLillard1 is offline
762*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 780
It seems to be a growing trend having the new rise right next to the old. In the case of Busch Stadium its replacement rose literally right next to it and eventually overtook the same space.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-14-2007, 07:41 AM
PeteU's Avatar
PeteU PeteU is offline
Birds and Fish
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardLillard1
It seems to be a growing trend having the new rise right next to the old. In the case of Busch Stadium its replacement rose literally right next to it and eventually overtook the same space.
I think it is easier to acquire land (sometimes the stadium will actually be built on city owned land as in the parking lot to the current stadium). Plus there is no issue of the stadium's neighbors complaining about increased noise and traffic in the area, as such conditions are already existing due to the current stadium.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Copyright © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Part of the
Baseball Almanac family: 755 Home Runs | Baseball Box Scores | Football Almanac | Pigskin Fever | Today in Baseball History.