Baseball Fever  

Go Back   Baseball Fever > American League > Kansas City Royals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-16-2005, 10:20 AM
GoRoyals's Avatar
GoRoyals GoRoyals is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 20
How the Royals crush young talent...

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...i/12561553.htm

This is an interesting article on the current woes of Royals pitcher Zack Greinke and helps explain to outsiders at least one aspect of why the Royals are having such a god-awful season.

Last edited by GoRoyals; 09-16-2005 at 12:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2005, 10:27 AM
Gooch Gooch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 338
Interesting article.
I'm not a Royals fan, but I think hiring George Brett as GM or director of player personnel would be a good step. The Royals were a first-class organization from the late 1970s through the early 1990s (I think they based their "culture" on the Dodgers). But now they seem lost and hopeless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-16-2005, 12:27 PM
GoRoyals's Avatar
GoRoyals GoRoyals is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 20
Brett would get a lot of attention...

... and he's revered in Kansas City. It would be a good fit. He'd get a longer pass from the media and the fans than most GM's. Bill James (of the famous Baseball Abstract and the book Moneyball) is a Royals fan and it might be interesting to see how his theories pan out on the worst team in baseball. Maybe the Royals can lure him away from the Red Sox, but I don't think that David Glass (the owner) would put up any kind of money for him.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2005, 07:06 PM
Gooch Gooch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 338
As I recall, the core of the great 1980s clubs the Royals had consisted of home-grown talent (Brett, Frank White, Saberhagen, Quiz, etc.). But these days as a small-market team, KC will have a tough time holding onto great young players. I don't know what the solution is.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:52 AM
Steve Jeltz Steve Jeltz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch
As I recall, the core of the great 1980s clubs the Royals had consisted of home-grown talent (Brett, Frank White, Saberhagen, Quiz, etc.). But these days as a small-market team, KC will have a tough time holding onto great young players. I don't know what the solution is.
The solution is an ownership with deep pockets, a commitment to winning and hiring the right personnel to make the baseball decisons. Someboby such as the late Ewing Kauffman. You can win anywhere, regardless of market size, with the above mentioned ingredients.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:54 PM
Ytown Tribe fan's Avatar
Ytown Tribe fan Ytown Tribe fan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scrappers territory
Posts: 839
The solution can be found in Minnesota and Oakland and Cleveland, all teams with small payrolls and small income-bases.

Your GM has got to go. Period.

I made my home in the KC-South area for about a dozen years, starting in the early '80s, and it goes without saying that the Royals were fun to watch for a good part of that time.

Everyone in the front office deserves DIS-credit for what has happened to that team, including George Brett, who was my favorite baseball player ever.

Last edited by Ytown Tribe fan; 09-23-2005 at 01:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2005, 07:34 PM
Marlins's Avatar
Marlins Marlins is offline
Made the Team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 71
If the Royals can get their young talent to start performing then they will be dangerous.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2005, 07:21 AM
JamieMc's Avatar
JamieMc JamieMc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
George Brett wouldn't leave the life he has now (basic retirement and not doing much of anything) to lead the hectic life of a GM.

Secondly, people always say that Ewing Kauffman would be putting out the big bucks today. There was an article about a year ago in the KC Star that quoted a bunch of people who knew Mr. K and they all said he would not spend money like is being spent today.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2005, 05:02 AM
Steve Jeltz Steve Jeltz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,305
Kauffman did shell out the bucks for the farm system and a top notch front office, major reasons why the Royals were considered one of the top teams in baseball in the 70's and 80's. Once Kauffman passed away, the Royals went into a swift decline with the estate cutting costs and then David Glass working on the cheap.

The fact remains that Glass must sell and a new GM is desperately needed. This regime is not commited to winning and this regime would prefer to live on the limited revenue sharing in baseball. Until some new owner steps in or the Royals somehow catch lightning in a bottle, 90 plus losses a season will be the norm for K.C. And that is a shame because I remember when K.C. was once among the elite in baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2005, 06:35 AM
JamieMc's Avatar
JamieMc JamieMc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
But he did not shell out the type of money that it takes to win today. Before he died the Royals had one of the highest saleries in baseball at something like $32 million.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-28-2005, 12:08 PM
plask_stirlac's Avatar
plask_stirlac plask_stirlac is offline
Study hard!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieMc
But he did not shell out the type of money that it takes to win today. Before he died the Royals had one of the highest saleries in baseball at something like $32 million.
Isn't that higher than the Royals' payroll today, after years of salary raises and inflation?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-28-2005, 04:07 PM
KingJ's Avatar
KingJ KingJ is offline
Western fan of the East
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieMc
But he did not shell out the type of money that it takes to win today. Before he died the Royals had one of the highest saleries in baseball at something like $32 million.
The Royals 'roll when Kaufmann died in 1993 was $40.1 mil, or 8th in MLB and 5th in the AL:

1. Blue Jays - $51.9 mil
2. Braves - $47.2
3. Yankees - $46.5
4. Red Sox - $46.1
5. White Sox - $42.1
6. Reds - $41.6
7. Mets - $40.8
8. Royals - $40.1
9. Rangers - $39.9
10. Tigers - $39.0

Ah...such different times those were! Right now, I believe the Royals payroll is 30th in MLBand 13th in the AL. Only ahead of the two Florida teams.
__________________
The Q: Can the Cubs hold a 6-5 lead with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th?

The A: No

***********My Rant on Bud Selig***********
Selig is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Selig and a pigeon is that Selig intends to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture,

Last edited by KingJ; 12-28-2005 at 04:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2005, 08:19 PM
KCGHOST's Avatar
KCGHOST KCGHOST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 8,660
As long as we have a Bag of Hammers filling the GM role we have no hope. The farm system is still weak and he blunders every big decision he is given.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-01-2006, 01:53 PM
Blackout's Avatar
Blackout Blackout is offline
Makaveli the Don
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: maine
Posts: 2,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJ
The Royals 'roll when Kaufmann died in 1993 was $40.1 mil, or 8th in MLB and 5th in the AL:

1. Blue Jays - $51.9 mil
2. Braves - $47.2
3. Yankees - $46.5
4. Red Sox - $46.1
5. White Sox - $42.1
6. Reds - $41.6
7. Mets - $40.8
8. Royals - $40.1
9. Rangers - $39.9
10. Tigers - $39.0

Ah...such different times those were! Right now, I believe the Royals payroll is 30th in MLBand 13th in the AL. Only ahead of the two Florida teams.
wow, Arod makes 51.9 million every 2 years
__________________
Alex Rodriguez is a world champion! Who'da thunk it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2006, 10:17 PM
plask_stirlac's Avatar
plask_stirlac plask_stirlac is offline
Study hard!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,038
They're getting greinke ready to have some prime years on the coast? Or maybe in Toronto.
__________________
Yes, Jason Bay does exist.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Copyright © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Part of the
Baseball Almanac family: 755 Home Runs | Baseball Box Scores | Football Almanac | Pigskin Fever | Today in Baseball History.