![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is Jeff Kent a HoFer? | |||
| Yes-No Doubt! |
|
51 | 38.06% |
| Maybe, but he needs a few more good seasons |
|
65 | 48.51% |
| No, he's a hack! |
|
18 | 13.43% |
| Voters: 134. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeff Kent
Only watched Kent regularly during his days as a Giant, but I think his defense is under-rated. He had a strong arm for a 2B, which added to his value as a cutoff man. His range factor during his years in SF was 12% above league average (and is nearly 11% better than league average for his career) and he was solid in turning the double play.
Offensively, I think he's already done enough to qualify. His career OPS+ of 126 is higher than other 2B HOFers such as Gehringer (124), Frisch (111), Schoendienst (93), Evers (106), McPhee (106), Sandberg (114), Fox (94), Lazzeri (121), Doerr (115), and Herman (112). I may have missed someone, but at first glance, the only 2B's in the Hall that have a higher career OPS+ than Kent is Hornsby (175), Lajoie (150), Collins (141) and Morgan (132); and those four (in some order) are generally considered to be the four best of all time. Granted, his career number will likely further decline as he continues to play as he is in the twilight of his career, but he'd also have an LQ advantage over all the others named (to various degrees) in any head-to-head comparison. Kent may not be a first ballot guy, but I certainly see him getting inducted at some point and I think he would deserve that honor. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jeff Kent
What are peoples' thoughts on Jeff Kents chances? He already has the record for most career homeruns by a 2B, and he'll likely finish his career in the 350-400 homerun range; he has an MVP award; and 7 100+ RBI seasons, tied for the most by a 2B.
He obviously is one of the most productive 2B in history, but how much of that has been a product of the Juiced Era? I kind of think that in any era, 350 homeruns by a secondbasemen is impressive. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
He has a good chance, but he'll probably have to have 2-3 more good years to be safe.
Yes, he does have 300+ HRs, but playing in his era hurts what that looks like. He was only in the top 10 in his league for HRs once, and never in the top 5. His RBI numbers actually look better than his HR numbers. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agee that he has a shot.The next 3-5 years of stats are what shall seal the deal of his hall induction.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
At this point I see him as an 80-85% HOFer, if that makes any sense to anybody.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think of Sandberg as a much superior player to Kent. Sandberg will most likely get in this year or next, but the fact that he's struggled so much doesn't bode well for Kent, especially since his one claim to fame, home runs, might be seen as tainted by the Juiced era.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Whitaker also only made the top 10 once i was putting 300 HRs into juiced context...SSs aren't supposed to hit HRs either... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
If Kent hit 100 HR less, but played in a different era, he might have a slightly better chance, not that he has a bad chance now.
That fact that his numbers look a lot better once he hit SF makes him look uneven as a player also. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't forget the man beat Barry Bonds out for an MVP Award!
Likely Hall of Fame material.
__________________
No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball." -- Connie Mack
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd put Kent's chances in the 40-50% range. Obviously he'll get a lot of consideration, but many voters will discount his big RBI years somewhat, because he had Bonds on base in front of him. Kent was a late bloomer, and has played in only 1777 games. Also, he isn't known as a great fielder, so he'll be getting in mostly on his bat. He'll need 3 more decent-to-good years to move into the Sandberg/Biggio/Larkin range. At this point I don't know how Kent can rate ahead of guys like Trammell and Whitaker, who haven't gotten many votes.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd say he has a 75-80% percent chance. Now a days though, I think most players are judged by the number of home runs he hits.
__________________
It's not the pace of life that I mind. It's the sudden stop at the life. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Rogers Hornsby (14 times) Joe Gordon (9) Nap Lajoie (9) Bobby Doerr (7) Ryne Sandberg (5) Tony Lazerri (4) Ross Barnes (3) Charlie Gehringer (3) Joe Morgan (3) Bret Boone (2) Bobby Grich (2) Alfonso Soriano (2) Kent is the third best second baseman of his era (after Biggio and Alomar). That's ok, but there's nothing about him that strikes me as particularly impressive, and his rapport with the press certainly won't do him any favors. He seems like a no to me.
__________________
"Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched." Sean McAdam, ESPN.com Last edited by ElHalo; 12-11-2004 at 07:39 PM. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another thing:
It seems to me like these guys are mortal locks to make the HoF (counting only active guys with at least ten years in): Ivan Rodriguez Mike Piazza Raphael Palmeiro Roberto Alomar Craig Biggio Derek Jeter Alex Rodriguez Barry Bonds Manny Ramirez Ken Griffey, Jr. Sammy Sosa Greg Maddux Roger Clemens Randy Johnson Pedro Martinez Mariano Rivera With a few more guys who are very likely to make it. That seems like an awful lot of active players to be making the Hall of Fame. If we start adding in more peripheral guys, like Kent, it will make it the "Hall of Great 1990's Players." I don't know how good of an idea that is.
__________________
"Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched." Sean McAdam, ESPN.com |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
).Also, when will Joe Gordon get his due? 9 times in the top 10? Wow. That's impressive for a secondbasemen. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As to Glavine, Thomas, and Bagwell, I considered putting all three on, but I just don't see Glavine as a slam dunk HoF'er (in all honesty, he would be in any other era, but comparing him to Clemens, Johnson, Pedro, and Maddux is just tough on him), people have been tough on Thomas of late for his DH'ing and injury history, so as great as he is, I'd call him a 95% chance rather than a 100% chance right now... and if Thomas isn't on the list, there's no way I can put Bagwell there.
__________________
"Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched." Sean McAdam, ESPN.com |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hope Kent gets in(after Ryno).He has been a run producing machine
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jeff Kent
Is Jeft Kent a HoFer?
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
If he retired today, without question, no
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't like the "no" option.
Where's, "no, he's a solid player and an asset to any team, but not HOF-worthy" |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
He certainly deserves it now and is doing nothing but adding to it so far this year. He tackles Hornsbys,Lazzerris and Rynos records. I hope he asks Keith Hernandez, who tried his best to sabotage his early career ,to give the speech
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
He could be... if he can put in two or three more good seasons. His big power numbers will be rightly discounted somewhat, due to the era he has played in. And he'll be competing with Alomar and Biggio for the voters attention.
Last edited by mac195; 04-22-2005 at 09:15 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|