EricDavis
08-06-2009, 02:10 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/sports/baseball/06cards.html?_r=1
The Topps Company will become the exclusive trading card maker of Major League Baseball next year in a multiyear deal that appears to seriously hurt Upper Deck, its primary competitor in the once-vibrant business.
Skip to next paragraph
Keep up with the latest news on The Times’s baseball blog.
Go to the Bats Blog »
By dropping Upper Deck, M.L.B. hopes that Topps, under Michael D. Eisner, the former chief executive of the Walt Disney Company, can invigorate card collecting, especially with young fans. The league also believes that one cardmaker can end the confusion of competitors selling multiple card series in hobby shops and big-box stores.
“This is redirecting the entire category toward kids,” said Eisner, who acquired the company in 2007. “Topps has been making cards for 60 years, the last 30 in a nonexclusive world that has caused confusion to the kid who walks into a Wal-Mart or a hobby store. It’s also been difficult to promote cards as unique and original.”
Upper Deck refused to address the Topps deal, which is to be announced Thursday. A spokesman for Upper Deck, based in Carlsbad, Calif., said only that it renewed its trading card license with the Major League Baseball Players Association last month and would keep producing cards. While the union license gives Upper Deck the right to use player likenesses, it will no longer have the rights to team logos and trademarks.
The union did not respond to requests for comment.
The old-line Topps, with roots in Brooklyn and its headquarters in downtown Manhattan, is associated with the stiff stick of chewing gum that once appeared in each pack. It is historically linked to children trading and flipping cards, and to the clatter created by inserting the little pieces of cardboard in the spokes of bicycle wheels.
In the 1980s, as collecting cards for fun turned into the more adult pursuit of investing in cards for profit, Topps faced a corps of rivals like Fleer, Donruss, Leaf, Score and, most significantly, the innovative Upper Deck.
Now, baseball has decided it needs only Topps.
“There is a greater chance of organizing the marketplace with a singular partner,” said Tim Brosnan, executive vice president for business at Major League Baseball. “It’s a business that’s critically important to our mission, to make players icons to kids.”
The business has shrunk drastically since the mid-1990s. T. S. O’Connell, the editor of Sports Collectors Digest, estimated that it was one-fifth the size it was before the 1994-95 players strike.
“As draconian as it sounds,” to give Topps the exclusive license, O’Connell said, “there could be pluses to it. I’m not wishing Upper Deck out of the picture, but it’s difficult for the market to support the significant number of cards that are produced every year. You could see some stability coming out of this.”
Since Eisner’s privately held Tornante Company and Madison Dearborn, a private equity company, acquired Topps, it has introduced 3-D cards, the ToppsTown trading and collecting Web site, and the Topps Attax game to appeal to young card enthusiasts and to develop new ones.
“We’re going to be very aggressive in letting retailers, kids and hobbyists know that we are the card that represents it all,” Eisner said.
Making Topps the official trading card of baseball follows M.L.B.’s business model. It has, for example, an official car (Chevrolet), credit card (MasterCard), soft drink (Pepsi) and cap (New Era). For that reason, Brosnan said, baseball does not believe there are antitrust implications in entering a similar deal with Topps.
Typically, an exclusive license is more expensive to the company than a nonexclusive arrangement.
Brosnan said that a recent federal court decision that backed the N.F.L.’s right to make Reebok its exclusive headwear sponsor affirmed baseball’s policy.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of the case from American Needle Inc.
Eisner said that Topps’s successful deals as the exclusive soccer cardmaker of the English Premier League and the German Bundesliga had proved that cards could appeal to fans 8 to 13 years old.
“They’re buying them, trading them, the way I did when I was a kid,” said Eisner, a New York Giants baseball fan, who says that, like many men of his generation (he is 67), his mother threw out his collection.
Dennis Gordon, who owns the Baseball Shop in Orleans, Mass., said he was confident that Eisner could alter what he called the “stale” market with the exclusive Topps deal.
“Michael Eisner alone might make it more interesting for kids,” he said. “If he and his people can come up with a new-wave idea, go for it.”
Ok this makes me mad. Tell me if I'm looking at this all wrong.
We're the ones who are screwed. No real competition for Topps. Standards WILL decrease. Nothing good can come from a monopoly. Especially when the the company who gains the monopoly was giving a half-hearted effort before they were put in that situation. This pisses me off at MLB much more than the steroid crap, because that was the player's doing. This is the MLB saying "screw you" to the fans. We've already lost the competition Topps and UD had with Fleer, Score, Donruss. Now there is NO competition for Topps. They can roll out baseball cards with hotdog eating "athletes" on them and we'd have to buy them (Oh wait they already do that WITH competition.)
I could understand an argument that I'm overreacting. But when we got down to just Topps and UD baseball card variety and quality suffered. Topps and UD seemed so awesome because Donruss sucked so bad. Now it's gonna be all Topps, all the time. Where does a disgruntled customer turn if Topps puts out garbage or their customer service gets even worse than it already is.
Additionally, how is this gonna help kids get into collecting? If they want kids to get into collecting all they need to do is make a few kid oriented sets and and promote them widely. If UD and Topps were producing a few kids sets and COMPETING for the kids attention don't you think those kids would get a better, more attractive product at a more attractive rate? That's just how markets work.
Topps just gave MLB an offer they couldn't refuse. MLB said "screw the fan" and took the offer.
Hope I'm wrong and this rant turns out to be ridiculous. Let me eat crow.
The Topps Company will become the exclusive trading card maker of Major League Baseball next year in a multiyear deal that appears to seriously hurt Upper Deck, its primary competitor in the once-vibrant business.
Skip to next paragraph
Keep up with the latest news on The Times’s baseball blog.
Go to the Bats Blog »
By dropping Upper Deck, M.L.B. hopes that Topps, under Michael D. Eisner, the former chief executive of the Walt Disney Company, can invigorate card collecting, especially with young fans. The league also believes that one cardmaker can end the confusion of competitors selling multiple card series in hobby shops and big-box stores.
“This is redirecting the entire category toward kids,” said Eisner, who acquired the company in 2007. “Topps has been making cards for 60 years, the last 30 in a nonexclusive world that has caused confusion to the kid who walks into a Wal-Mart or a hobby store. It’s also been difficult to promote cards as unique and original.”
Upper Deck refused to address the Topps deal, which is to be announced Thursday. A spokesman for Upper Deck, based in Carlsbad, Calif., said only that it renewed its trading card license with the Major League Baseball Players Association last month and would keep producing cards. While the union license gives Upper Deck the right to use player likenesses, it will no longer have the rights to team logos and trademarks.
The union did not respond to requests for comment.
The old-line Topps, with roots in Brooklyn and its headquarters in downtown Manhattan, is associated with the stiff stick of chewing gum that once appeared in each pack. It is historically linked to children trading and flipping cards, and to the clatter created by inserting the little pieces of cardboard in the spokes of bicycle wheels.
In the 1980s, as collecting cards for fun turned into the more adult pursuit of investing in cards for profit, Topps faced a corps of rivals like Fleer, Donruss, Leaf, Score and, most significantly, the innovative Upper Deck.
Now, baseball has decided it needs only Topps.
“There is a greater chance of organizing the marketplace with a singular partner,” said Tim Brosnan, executive vice president for business at Major League Baseball. “It’s a business that’s critically important to our mission, to make players icons to kids.”
The business has shrunk drastically since the mid-1990s. T. S. O’Connell, the editor of Sports Collectors Digest, estimated that it was one-fifth the size it was before the 1994-95 players strike.
“As draconian as it sounds,” to give Topps the exclusive license, O’Connell said, “there could be pluses to it. I’m not wishing Upper Deck out of the picture, but it’s difficult for the market to support the significant number of cards that are produced every year. You could see some stability coming out of this.”
Since Eisner’s privately held Tornante Company and Madison Dearborn, a private equity company, acquired Topps, it has introduced 3-D cards, the ToppsTown trading and collecting Web site, and the Topps Attax game to appeal to young card enthusiasts and to develop new ones.
“We’re going to be very aggressive in letting retailers, kids and hobbyists know that we are the card that represents it all,” Eisner said.
Making Topps the official trading card of baseball follows M.L.B.’s business model. It has, for example, an official car (Chevrolet), credit card (MasterCard), soft drink (Pepsi) and cap (New Era). For that reason, Brosnan said, baseball does not believe there are antitrust implications in entering a similar deal with Topps.
Typically, an exclusive license is more expensive to the company than a nonexclusive arrangement.
Brosnan said that a recent federal court decision that backed the N.F.L.’s right to make Reebok its exclusive headwear sponsor affirmed baseball’s policy.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of the case from American Needle Inc.
Eisner said that Topps’s successful deals as the exclusive soccer cardmaker of the English Premier League and the German Bundesliga had proved that cards could appeal to fans 8 to 13 years old.
“They’re buying them, trading them, the way I did when I was a kid,” said Eisner, a New York Giants baseball fan, who says that, like many men of his generation (he is 67), his mother threw out his collection.
Dennis Gordon, who owns the Baseball Shop in Orleans, Mass., said he was confident that Eisner could alter what he called the “stale” market with the exclusive Topps deal.
“Michael Eisner alone might make it more interesting for kids,” he said. “If he and his people can come up with a new-wave idea, go for it.”
Ok this makes me mad. Tell me if I'm looking at this all wrong.
We're the ones who are screwed. No real competition for Topps. Standards WILL decrease. Nothing good can come from a monopoly. Especially when the the company who gains the monopoly was giving a half-hearted effort before they were put in that situation. This pisses me off at MLB much more than the steroid crap, because that was the player's doing. This is the MLB saying "screw you" to the fans. We've already lost the competition Topps and UD had with Fleer, Score, Donruss. Now there is NO competition for Topps. They can roll out baseball cards with hotdog eating "athletes" on them and we'd have to buy them (Oh wait they already do that WITH competition.)
I could understand an argument that I'm overreacting. But when we got down to just Topps and UD baseball card variety and quality suffered. Topps and UD seemed so awesome because Donruss sucked so bad. Now it's gonna be all Topps, all the time. Where does a disgruntled customer turn if Topps puts out garbage or their customer service gets even worse than it already is.
Additionally, how is this gonna help kids get into collecting? If they want kids to get into collecting all they need to do is make a few kid oriented sets and and promote them widely. If UD and Topps were producing a few kids sets and COMPETING for the kids attention don't you think those kids would get a better, more attractive product at a more attractive rate? That's just how markets work.
Topps just gave MLB an offer they couldn't refuse. MLB said "screw the fan" and took the offer.
Hope I'm wrong and this rant turns out to be ridiculous. Let me eat crow.