Pete Rose Rounding Third
04-10-2007, 02:01 AM
Here's the situation: The home team leads 6-0 after six innings. In the top of the seventh, this is what happens:
1st batter: Solo HR
2nd batter: Out
3rd batter: draws a walk
4th batter: hits an RBI double
5th batter: draws a walk
Now the score is 6-2 and there's first and second, one out. The 6th batter of the inning is a low average, solid on-base, high power guy. This is right about the time the broadcaster says something like, "A home run here kills the rally".
Something about that seems idiotic, but I don't think there's nothing valid about that. What's happened so far in the inning is the very definition of a rally, and a bases-clearing homer would certainly end that. There's no more pitching from the stretch, and now the inning starts clean with the benefit of an out already posted; however, is it not more important to close the gap to one run rather than keep a rally going? The broadcaster's statement "A home run here kills the rally" seems to imply that a single or walk would be better than a homer.
I hope I've communicated my thoughts accurately on this issue, but doesn't the homer seem better on the basis of "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"?
1st batter: Solo HR
2nd batter: Out
3rd batter: draws a walk
4th batter: hits an RBI double
5th batter: draws a walk
Now the score is 6-2 and there's first and second, one out. The 6th batter of the inning is a low average, solid on-base, high power guy. This is right about the time the broadcaster says something like, "A home run here kills the rally".
Something about that seems idiotic, but I don't think there's nothing valid about that. What's happened so far in the inning is the very definition of a rally, and a bases-clearing homer would certainly end that. There's no more pitching from the stretch, and now the inning starts clean with the benefit of an out already posted; however, is it not more important to close the gap to one run rather than keep a rally going? The broadcaster's statement "A home run here kills the rally" seems to imply that a single or walk would be better than a homer.
I hope I've communicated my thoughts accurately on this issue, but doesn't the homer seem better on the basis of "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"?