PDA

View Full Version : Jake Beckley - ballplayer, HOFer, true character of the game


Dodgerfan1
04-07-2007, 08:00 AM
Very little has been said about Hall of Famer Jake Beckley on this forum. He was, of course, a great ballplayer with a .308 lifetime BA and the nickname of ‘Eagle Eye.’ He could hit better than most players, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame website calls him a ‘solid first baseman.’ That may have been true regarding his glove work, but they obviously weren’t considering his erratic arm when making that statement. He may have been able to hit better than most, but he couldn’t throw worth a damn. He had an early version of the Steve Sax/Chuck Knoblauch mental block when it came to throwing the ball.

Pittsburgh’s Tommy Leach liked to reminisce about the times that he took advantage of Beckley’s scattergun arm. During a 1905 game which pitted his Pirates against Beckley’s Cardinals, Jake was patrolling first base, as usual. Leach laid down a bunt which required Beckley to field the ball. He scooped it up just as pitcher Jack Taylor was approaching the first base bag to take the throw. Beckley, rather than risk a bad throw with an overhand motion, tossed the ball underhanded to Taylor. It sailed three feet over the pitcher’s head.

Beckley, who darted after the ball as soon as he realized he had made a horrific toss, dashed past Taylor and recovered it in foul territory. By now, Leach had rounded second base and was well on his way to third. When he paused and looked back, he noticed Beckley had the ball and, deciding it was good gamble to run on Jake’s notoriously erratic arm, lit out for home. Beckley, meanwhile, rather than attempt what would have been an easy throw to the plate for anyone else, decided to sprint for home rather than risk another crappy throw. After a mad dash, he arrived at the plate at the same moment that Leach began his feet-first slide. Lunging headlong with the ball extended, he tagged Leach out, breaking two of Tommy’s ribs with the hard tag!

Beckley tried to atone for his throwing shortcomings by employing the old hidden ball trick whenever he could. He often hid the ball under the first base bag whenever the runner (and apparently everyone on the other team, as well) wasn’t looking. Of course, the pitcher would go into his motion, as if he had the ball, the runner would take his lead, Beckley would sidle over to the bag, grab the ball and tag out the runner. One time, however, even that ploy backfired badly.

In a 1906 game against Pittsburgh, Honus Wagner was on first when Jake slyly hid the ball under the base. When Wagner took his leadoff, Beckley reached under the bag but couldn’t find the ball. Seeing this, Wagner took off for second base. Jake had groped under the wrong corner of the base allowing the quick-witted Wagner to sprint for second. Frantically, Beckley began lifting each corner of the bag until he finally came up with the prize and, predictably, heaved a wild throw to second, allowing Wagner to take third base easily.

Then there was the time in 1903 when Beckley, playing first for Cincinnati, tried a new twist on the hidden ball trick. Oddly, the opponent was, once again, the Pittsburgh Pirates. The Bucs had Otto Krueger on first, having beaten out a bunt. Beckley pretended to throw the ball back to pitcher Noodles Hahn, but had previously slipped the ball up his own sleeve (uniforms being much looser in them thar days). Krueger, unaware of the chicanery, edged off the bag. Beckley then reached up his sleeve to retrieve the ball, wrapped his hand around it but couldn’t pull it out! Noticing Jake’s plight, and figuring out what was up, Krueger hightailed it for second. Meanwhile, Hahn raced over to Beckley and ripped the entire sleeve from his shirt! The ball dropped harmlessly to the ground. That was the last time Jake Beckley ever had anything up his sleeve during a ball game!

And that’s my Jake Beckley post! He was a real character of the game. He would have gotten along well with fellow character, Pete Browning!

538280
04-07-2007, 08:23 AM
When I was at the Baseball HOF they had a trivia contest and asked what HOF 1Bman was known for pulling hidden ball tricks, I knew the answer, it was Jake Beckley. Really, though, he was a character and thanks for your post about him, I didn't know much about him except he was known for hidden ball tricks. Sometimes, however, I am questionable about his HOF worthiness. Kind of like an early day Eddie Murray except without as high a sustained performance (Beckley only had one season with OPS+ over 150, 1890 in the Player's League, which IS legit BTW). Murray had an extremely high sustained performance from the years 1981-1984 where his OPS+ was over 150 every year, and he just missed at 149 in 1985. He also had 159 in 1990.

Many of the best 19th century players were 1Bmen. I think we can draw parallels between many of those players and contemporary 1Bmen in terms of career path and progression. Beckley is Eddie Murray, like I just said. Cap Anson is Rafael Palmeiro. Anson lasted a bit longer than Palmeiro but their career paths and levels of long consistency are still just about the same. Roger Connor is Jeff Bagwell. The all around 1Bman who can run and field as well as hit really well and has some monster peak seasons. Dan Brouthers is Frank Thomas, the best hitter of them all, but weaker at other portions of the game.

Fuzzy Bear
04-07-2007, 10:45 AM
One of the very best players of the 19th century, and one of the true transitional players from 19th century baseball to early 20th century baseball. Beckley is one 19th century player that would be a star in any era.

leecemark
04-07-2007, 10:50 AM
--He was only a minor star in his own era. I think Chris' comparison would be better served with Beckley as an earlier Palmerio rather than Anson. Anson was a major star in his prime. Like Raffy, Beckley was never clear the best 1B in his league and only rarely was he even in the discussion for being so (never close to the discussion for best player). Beckley had alot of good and a few very good seasons, but never a great one.

rsuriyop
04-07-2007, 11:48 AM
From what I've understood, Beckley apppeared to be a pretty solid first baseman, who never recieved the same kind of praise as other slugging first basemen from his own era. That said, I still see him as a legit HOF'er, one that I've been consistently voting for on the BBF HOF thread these past couple of months. To me he's basically the Fred McGriff of his time--consistently very good, though never great, and certainly overlooked first baseman.

AG2004
04-08-2007, 12:40 AM
If you equate Beckley to McGriff, Palmeiro, or Murray, you are overrating Beckley. The best comparison to Beckley would be Wally Joyner.

Beckley had 9 All-Star-type seasons (I adjust pre-1890 seasons to 140 games, and seasons from 1890-1903 to 154 games) during his career. Joyner had 7 seasons with 20+ win shares, and an additional 19-win-share season in the AL (which would have been 20 win shares in the NL, since there would have no DH to award offensive win shares to). Both of them also had lengthy careers.

However, neither of them had a great peak, or was even close to being great at any point in their careers. Joyner had one season with 25 win shares, but, other than that one year, he never had more than 22 win shares in any season. Beckley's highest single-season win share total, even after adjustments, was 23. Neither of them would be capable of being the best player on a team that could regularly contend for the pennant.

Joyner only had one season where he was actually an All-Star, depsite eight All-Star-type seasons, as there were always much better first basemen during his career. Beckley, on the other hand, did not face such stiff competition. None of the first basemen during the 1895-1899 period was that good, and Beckley stands out only because of the length of his career. In terms of peak alone, Beckley was about equal to Piano Legs Hickman and Tommy Tucker, and not quite as good as Henry Larkin.

Beckley was one of the Frisch Veteran's Committee selections, and went in with such luminaries as Dave Bancroft, Chick Hafey, and Rube Marquard. Only by Frisch's standards can Beckley be regarded as a good choice; I can't see how else he would have deserved the honor of induction into Cooperstown.

KCGHOST
04-09-2007, 10:34 AM
Beckley is not a horrible choice for the HoF. His RCAA is a respectable 330 and his WARP3 is 101. These are the kinds of scores you associate with all-stars, not HoFer. The problem is it took him over 10,000 AB's to accumulate those kinds of numbers. Keith Hernandez has comparable RCAA and WARP3 scores in 2000 fewer PA's.

538280
04-09-2007, 04:07 PM
If you equate Beckley to McGriff, Palmeiro, or Murray, you are overrating Beckley. The best comparison to Beckley would be Wally Joyner.

Beckley had 9 All-Star-type seasons (I adjust pre-1890 seasons to 140 games, and seasons from 1890-1903 to 154 games) during his career. Joyner had 7 seasons with 20+ win shares, and an additional 19-win-share season in the AL (which would have been 20 win shares in the NL, since there would have no DH to award offensive win shares to). Both of them also had lengthy careers.

However, neither of them had a great peak, or was even close to being great at any point in their careers. Joyner had one season with 25 win shares, but, other than that one year, he never had more than 22 win shares in any season. Beckley's highest single-season win share total, even after adjustments, was 23. Neither of them would be capable of being the best player on a team that could regularly contend for the pennant.

Joyner only had one season where he was actually an All-Star, depsite eight All-Star-type seasons, as there were always much better first basemen during his career. Beckley, on the other hand, did not face such stiff competition. None of the first basemen during the 1895-1899 period was that good, and Beckley stands out only because of the length of his career. In terms of peak alone, Beckley was about equal to Piano Legs Hickman and Tommy Tucker, and not quite as good as Henry Larkin.

Beckley was one of the Frisch Veteran's Committee selections, and went in with such luminaries as Dave Bancroft, Chick Hafey, and Rube Marquard. Only by Frisch's standards can Beckley be regarded as a good choice; I can't see how else he would have deserved the honor of induction into Cooperstown.

I agree with you here for the most part; it's more in career path and reputatoin that Beckley is like Murray. Murray also played against much tougher competition with a fully integrated league and when scouting allowed most the world's best players to actually be playing baseball. Murray had three MVP type seasons by WS. The more I look into it about Joyner, the more you're probably right as well-and taking into account the quality of competition he may even be just below Joyner.

Fuzzy Bear
01-01-2009, 09:08 PM
Beckley was a Frisch-era VC pick. He was not a "crony", and his selection was not one of the "crony" selections of Frankie Frisch (the VCs forerunner to Rod Blagojevich, if you ask me).

Beckley had over 2,900 hits and a lifetime BA over .308. These things got the attention of the VC in the early seventies because baseball was emerging from an extremely low BA period; Yaz had won the AL batting crown with a .301 BA in 1968, the only AL hitter to hit over .300 for the year. (It honestly looked like the 1968 AL batting champ might be a guy hitting .299 for a while.)

Beckley is an OK HOFer. I see no reason to change my earlier post on the subject after rethinking the issue. He's not the strongest HOFer, but he would be a HOFer in any era, IMO.

Beckley had TREMENDOUS defensive range factors. I wonder if this is some kind of statistical illusion, or if he really did cover so much more ground at 1B than the normal 1Bman. Beckley threw left handed; it's possible he fielded well enough to play SS or 3B, but was placed on 1B because he was left handed. I think he deserves SOME defensive bonus; how much is in question.