PDA

View Full Version : BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1992


Freakshow
03-21-2007, 01:58 PM
Welcome to Baseball Fever's Mock HOF VC Election for 1992. This is the sixth election in a project to conduct Hall of Fame VC elections from 1987-2001 (and perhaps beyond). You're being asked to play the role of a VC voter, as if you were actually part of the VC conclaves of that time. The goal of this project is to elect the best candidate each time, with the knowledge you are applying a lower standard than used for the BBWAA elections. These elections will not consider players already elected in BBF Mock BBWAA elections, such as Ashburn, Santo, Allen and Cepeda.

This post will provide two things:

1) The Format and Rules

2) A Guide for the 1992 Election

Format and Rules
- The HOF VC never published an actual ballot, and the results of their voting were not compiled for public consumption. At the same time, they rarely considered players who retired over 70 years ago, preferring guys they fondly remembered seeing. Thus, our focus will be towards 20th century players they should have been considering. Our ballot will allow them a 50-year window of retirees (1919-1968 for this election). This will eliminate most players whose careers began in the 19th century. As the actual VC did, we will consider those players in separate ballots 1995-2001. The VC was also giving short shrift to Negro league candidates at this time. Again, as the actual VC did, we will consider those players in separate ballots 1995-2001.

- We will have a 33-player ballot for this election, down from 37 in 1991. I will act as the screening committee. You can suggest other candidates, of course, and if I get a second for a candidate I’ll add him to the next ballot. This number will mainly decline as we proceed with elections, but we will always list at least 25 candidates. Close attention will be paid to identifying candidates who are in their last two years of eligibility (1919-20 retirees for the 1992 election).

- Voters may vote for between 1-33 candidates; you’re free to support anyone you think is deserving of the Hall. Because we are electing only one player each time, voters will have complete freedom to support everyone they like. This policy is consistent with the VC rules in force at the time.

- A "None of the Above" option is not available. We operate under the premise that the continued existence of a veterans committee establishes a fait accompli, that it is an acknowledgment that there are worthy players who should be elected. Our mandate is to identify the best ones, so figure out which players deserve the honor and vote for them. (The words above the poll, “but at least five,” are a suggestion and not a requirement, that we might have a better chance of fulfilling our mandate and actually electing a few guys.)

- We will enshrine the leading vote-getter so long as he is supported by a majority of the voters (more than 50% needed); but only one player per year maximum. If two or more players with +50% tie for first place, the one with better support in recent elections will be enshrined.

- Players will ensure their continuing on the ballot as long as they average 10% support over three years (candidates failing this requirement will sometimes be added back to the ballot to reach the 25-player minimum or if they’re deemed deserving of another chance). Players in their final year eligible will be allowed to continue beyond that as long as they receive 15% support. We’ll also give new candidates a chance to build some momentum: players drawing less than 10% may also continue on the ballot if their vote percentage equals or exceeds 2.5 times their years eligible. Look at that in chart form:

Yr 1 needs 2.5%
Yr 2 needs 5.0%
Yr 3 needs 7.5%
Yr 4 needs 10.0%

- This thread is also meant to be a discussion thread, so please feel free to stump for and/or against players, including players that will come up for election in the following year.

- When figuring a candidate’s worthiness, everything counts, the sum of their lifetime in baseball. Some players have significant manager credit – Red Schoendienst, Gil Hodges, maybe Harvey Kuenn. Others, like Lefty O’Doul, made contributions that nearly surpassed their playing career.

- The election will close exactly a week after it started. The next election might not commence for another day or two.

- IMPORTANT: There is some concern about voters defrauding this process by voting with multiple screen names. First, please don't as there is really no point and it takes the fun out of this which is to see how we come out, more than it being a heated competition to get your player elected. Nevertheless, to take precaution against the possibility of a voter abusing the process, votes will be made public, so if we see unfamiliar screen names casting similar ballots, we'll see cause for concern, and if the concern proves to be founded, some form of punitive action could follow. So basically, ONE PERSON = ONE BALLOT. Anything else is really just moronic and defeats the purpose.

- MORE IMPORTANT: Remember, this is not an election of the BBF VC; this is not the place to express your personal feelings as to where the line should be drawn for the Hall of Fame. You’re playing the role of a HOF VC voter. You go into that room with a list of players that you're supporting - nobody goes in there with the aim of objecting to every candidate brought up. By requesting, insisting, agitating for at least five votes, I'm trying to impress this reality on our electorate here: you've gotta support some guys. I am also asking voters to be sensitive to the consensus of who the top candidates are (see chart below) and try to support them. I've even taken the unpleasant step of singling out ballots that are obviously contrary to our aim.

Given the standards established through seven decades of voting, it’s clear that the BBWAA missed some guys that are over the line for the Hall. However, there aren’t any no-brainers on here; we’re dealing with players closer to the Hall’s in-out line. Careful study of the candidates is required to determine the ins from the outs. If you’re not up to this, please, no off-the-top-of-my-head ballots. Don’t just cast a contrarian ballot without good reasoning. If that means fewer ballots, that’s fine. I would rather have an informed vote of 12 ballots then a quick-and-dirty vote of 52 ballots. We need voters who are on board with the mission. Ballots that are judged to be frivolous or an obstruction to our goal of electing someone may be deleted from the poll.

1992 Guide
There are 33 candidates on the 1992 ballot. They all played their final game in the period 1919 to 1968. Here's some information regarding them:

Top Vote-getters in the 1987-91 Elections

38 bal 31 bal 31 bal 29 bal 31 bal
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Larry Doby CF 71.05 80.65 ----- ----- -----
Nellie Fox 2B NE NE 77.42 ----- -----
Hal Newhouser P 68.42 58.06 67.74 72.41 -----
Sherry Magee LF 52.63 58.06 67.74 65.52 64.52
Joe Gordon 2B 60.53 54.84 64.52 65.52 61.29
Red Schoendienst 2B 42.11 41.94 45.16 48.28 58.06
Carl Mays P 42.11 41.94 45.16 65.52 51.61
Gil Hodges 1B 34.21 45.16 35.48 58.62 48.39
Stan Hack 3B 47.37 51.61 58.06 68.97 45.16
Wes Ferrell P 31.58 35.48 41.94 48.28 41.94
Heinie Groh 3B 28.95 32.26 35.48 41.38 35.48
Larry Doyle 2B 15.79 16.13 29.03 41.38 35.48
Vern Stephens SS 18.42 16.13 19.35 34.48 35.48
Billy Pierce P NE 25.81 32.26 37.93 32.26
Gavy Cravath RF 23.68 25.81 25.81 37.93 29.03
Bob Johnson LF 23.68 22.58 22.58 24.14 22.58
Phil Rizzuto SS 23.68 16.13 12.90 24.14 22.58
Tony Lazzeri 2B 28.95 19.35 19.35 20.69 22.58
Bucky Walters P 10.53 12.90 16.13 20.69 22.58
Al Rosen 3B 18.42 19.35 6.45 24.14 19.35
Tommy Bridges P 5.26 12.90 12.90 20.69 19.35
Urban Shocker P 15.79 19.35 16.13 24.14 16.13
Lefty O'Doul LF 13.16 9.68 19.35 17.24 16.13

First Timers (3)
Rocky Colavito
Elston Howard
Roger Maris

Other Recently-New Eligibles
Dick Groat (2nd year)
Joe Adcock (3rd)
Harvey Kuenn (3rd)
Roy Sievers (4th)
Billy Pierce (5th)

Last Year of Eligibility
none

Next to Last Year of Eligibility
Gavy Cravath (http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=950&pid=2979)
Larry Doyle (http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=989&pid=3769)

Actual Hall of Famers on VC 1992 Ballot (3)
Tony Lazzeri (1991)
Phil Rizzuto (1994)
Red Schoendienst (1989)

Members of BBF Hall of Fame on VC 1992 Ballot (3)
Wes Ferrell
Joe Gordon
Stan Hack

Members of the Hall of Merit on VC 1992 Ballot (5)
Wes Ferrell
Joe Gordon
Heinie Groh
Stan Hack
Billy Pierce

Candidates Named to the BBF Hall of Corrections (3)
Wes Ferrell
Joe Gordon
Stan Hack

Candidates Listed on the 2007 Hall of Fame VC Ballot (8)
Wes Ferrell
Joe Gordon
Gil Hodges
Carl Mays
Don Newcombe
Lefty O’Doul
Cecil Travis
Mickey Vernon

For previous discussion of this project, see these threads:
Cooperstown, NY – Spring, 1986 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=57472)

BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1987 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=57498) (none elected)

BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1988 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=57838) (Larry Doby elected)

BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1989 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=58135) (Nellie Fox elected)

BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1990 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=58437) (Hal Newhouser elected)

BBF Mock Veterans Committee Election: 1991 (http://www.baseball-fever.com/showthread.php?t=58684) (Sherry Magee elected)

KCGHOST
03-21-2007, 02:27 PM
Bridges
Elliott
Ferrell
Hack
Johnson
Pierce
Schoendienst
Shocker

-Kyle-
03-21-2007, 07:21 PM
Voted 23...I voted for them as long as I saw somewhat of a reason for them.

Erik Bedard
03-21-2007, 07:45 PM
All right, let me stump for Gavy Cravath here:

1) The guy has a 150 career OPS+

2) He got a tremendously late start to his MLB career, but that was due to the PCL keeping him from the majors. He was an outstanding player in the PCL, which, at the time, was like an AAAA league -- about on a level with the Negro Leagues, though lacking some of the great stars. If you give him credit for his years in the PCL, then his career length becomes much less of an issue, and he looks like a legit HoFer.

3) He was a great power hitter BEFORE he came to Philadelphia and the Baker Bowl.

4) He was by far the leader in HR/AB from 1900-1919.

5) He led the Phillies to the 1915 pennant.

6) At one point, he held the record for most single-season HRs, except for Ned Williamson's fluke 27, in a park where every other year, HRs were counted as doubles.

7) He strung together six consecutive seasons of double-digit HRs, something nobody else did until Babe Ruth.

8) He had seven total seasons of double-digit HR totals, matched only by Roger Connor before Ruth.

The main points are #s 2 and 3.

Erik Bedard
03-21-2007, 07:49 PM
And again, I'll nominate Curt Simmons, and will continue to do so until somebody seconds him.

From the 1991 ballot thread

1) He has a career 111 ERA+ -- seven points higher than that of HoFer Catfish Hunter, and eight points ahead of fellow HoFer Rube Marquard.

2) In just his third full MLB season, he was arguably the Phillies' best starter as they won the NL pennant.

3) His career low in ERA+ is 81, and eight times topped 120.

4) In 1954, he would have been the best pitcher in the league if not for Johnny Antonelli.

5) He was consistently overshadowed by HoFer Robin Roberts, yet often put up better seasons than he did.

From the same thread:


Simmons' best comps, according to BBref, are Larry Jackson, Claude Osteen, and Doyle Alexander -- none of whom I would support for the HoF, even with the ultra-relaxed standards I employ in projects such as this, where the goal is to elect somebody, not to debate somebody's worthiness. However, none of them are even close to adequate comparisons for Simmons, who, at his best, was often among the top three pitchers in the league. Jackson and Osteen were basically consistently above-average guys, but ones who were rarely spectacular. Alexander was generally below-average, with a few good seasons. Simmons was generally above the league average as a pitcher, and had a few truly spectacular seasons. He pitched 20 seasons, and his two best ERA+ seasons were his fourth and his sixteenth. He was a guy who was consistently good, and often great. I would not support him in a project such as the mock BBWAA elections, but in these mock VC elections, I plan to vote for him for as long as it takes.

jalbright
03-21-2007, 08:14 PM
All right, let me stump for Gavy Cravath here:

..........
2) He got a tremendously late start to his MLB career, but that was due to the PCL keeping him from the majors. He was an outstanding player in the PCL, which, at the time, was like an AAAA league -- about on a level with the Negro Leagues, though lacking some of the great stars. If you give him credit for his years in the PCL, then his career length becomes much less of an issue, and he looks like a legit HoFer.

3) He was a great power hitter BEFORE he came to Philadelphia and the Baker Bowl.

..............
The main points are #s 2 and 3.

I agree with the last sentence, but unfortunately, I think there are issues with how you've presented these points. First of all, the latest Bill James Historical Abstract notes that Cravath failed trials with the Red Sox, Washington and the White Sox before going back to the minors and getting his shot in Philly. Doesn't sound like the PCL was the problem to me. Secondly, if Cravath was such a "great power hitter", please explain why in 1914, when he led the league with 19 homers, all of them were hit in the Baker Bowl and none on the road? He seems to be another guy who was greatly helped by an odd park, and with all the other baggage his case has, that's too much.

Jim Albright

THE OX
03-21-2007, 10:04 PM
And again, I'll nominate Curt Simmons, and will continue to do so until somebody seconds him.......

OK, Erik, I'll second Curt Simmons. He was the first major league baseball player I ever actually met in person when he did a speech at our junior high school in the winter of 1958/59. And I'm also impressed by the similarity of his stats to those of Larry Jackson which you quoted, as I think Jackson also deserves at least a shot at an Old Time Committee vote here on Baseball Fever.

Windy City Fan
03-22-2007, 12:05 AM
I agree with the last sentence, but unfortunately, I think there are issues with how you've presented these points. First of all, the latest Bill James Historical Abstract notes that Cravath failed trials with the Red Sox, Washington and the White Sox before going back to the minors and getting his shot in Philly. Doesn't sound like the PCL was the problem to me. Secondly, if Cravath was such a "great power hitter", please explain why in 1914, when he led the league with 19 homers, all of them were hit in the Baker Bowl and none on the road? He seems to be another guy who was greatly helped by an odd park, and with all the other baggage his case has, that's too much.

Jim Albright
His Boston numbers actually aren't bad at all. He had a slightly above average batting average, but showed a good eye and some decent power to get a 136 OPS+ in 277 at bats. Boston didn't want him because he was slow, plus they had another promising young rookie named Tris Speaker that year. And Harry Hooper was a year away and Duffy Lewis two years away, so Boston had young talent in the outfield to spare.

When the White Sox traded him, it was to get Sleepy Bill Burns (yes the guy involved in the Black Sox scandal), who was a fairly promising young pitcher coming off a rookie season with 11 complete games and a 1.69 ERA (136 ERA+). Burns was also off to a good start in 1909, posting a 1.23 ERA (192 ERA+) with the Senators before being traded for Cavath. The other two players the Sox included in the deal did not have nearly as much upside as Cavath, so its likely Cavath was considered the centerpiece of the Sox package. So its not like the White Sox gave him away, he was part of a deal for a promising prospect.

In Washington, after he "failed" his try out, the Washington field manager, Joe Cantillion, who just so happened to also own Minniapolis Millers, offered to buy his contract. Cavath became a huge star for Cantillion and was kept there until a clerical error (allegedly) opened the door for his to return to the majors.

Here's a link I found supporting what I stated: http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=950&pid=2979

Erik Bedard
03-22-2007, 05:40 AM
From Wikipedia:

He entered professional baseball in 1903 with the Los Angeles Angels of the Pacific Coast League; during 5 seasons with the team, he helped them win two pennants. He batted .274, .270, .259, .270, and .303, with 7, 13, 9, 6, and 10 home runs, and with 51, 50, 32, 39, and 45 doubles. He led the league in doubles twice (1906 and 1907) and also finished third twice. Although he never led the PCL in home runs, he was second in the league three times, third once, and fourth once during his 5 seasons.

His BA totals may not seem impressive at first glance, but remember, the PCL's BA totals were WAY lower than those of the MLB.

From PhillyBooster on BBTF's Hall of Merit board:

First, PCL stats. Remember that the PCL was a major "pitchers league." I have at my disposal currently team offensive stats (batting average) from every PCL team in 1905, which should give a taste for what 'league average' was. (Cravath played in L.A. from 1903-1907)

Seattle: .238
Los Angeles: .236
Portland: .232
San Francisco: .228
Tacoma: .226
Oakland: .215

Freakshow
03-22-2007, 06:52 AM
OK, Erik, I'll second Curt Simmons.
Simmons will be included on the 1993 ballot. That will be his third year eligible, so he will need 7.5% support (probably 3 votes) to continue on the ballot.

yankillaz
03-22-2007, 07:18 AM
My picks were:

Red Schoendienst
Stan Hack
Tony Lazzeri
Gil Hodges
Joe Gordon

Colorado Express
03-22-2007, 07:29 AM
Gordon
Hack
Hodges
Mays
Schoendienst

Freakshow
03-22-2007, 08:59 AM
The list of players who dropped off the ballot from lack of support, that remain eligible to return, now numbers 19:

Lew Burdette
Dolph Camilli
Walker Cooper
Wilbur Cooper
Alvin Dark
Del Ennis
Bob Friend
Jim Gilliam
Charlie Keller
Ted Kluszewski
Dolf Luque
Marty Marion
Frank McCormick
Buddy Myer
Johnny Pesky
Jack Quinn
Hal Trosky
Lon Warneke
Ed Yost

Players on the bubble in this election include these five candidates:
Cecil Travis needs 12%
Roy Sievers needs 10%
Joe Adcock needs 7.5%
Harvey Kuenn needs 7.5%
Dick Groat needs 5%

Freakshow
03-23-2007, 07:52 AM
For the 1993 ballot we're looking to add players who last played in 1969 (http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/ML_1969_final.shtml):

Ken Boyer
Roy Face
Bill White (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_White_%28baseball%29)

We're also considering adding players who last played in 1921:

Ed Konetchy (http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=1087&pid=7701)
Hippo Vaughn (http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=921&pid=14570)
Slim Sallee (http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=1085&pid=12415)

I'll nominate Boyer. Anyone else?

leecemark
03-23-2007, 08:27 AM
--I'll 2nd Boyer and nominate Vaughn.

Freakshow
03-23-2007, 01:38 PM
The list of players who dropped off the ballot from lack of support, that remain eligible to return, now numbers 19:
Charlie Keller

I'm nominating Charlie Keller for the 1993 ballot. Giving proper credit for military service and minor league play, he comes up a match for Ralph Kiner. He's Dick Allen without the baggage. Here's Keller's discussion thread at the Hall of Merit (http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/hall_of_merit/discussion/charlie_keller).

A good outfielder, too, he was among the elite hitters of his era:

Players with OPS within .090 of CK’s, 1938-51, minimum 4500 PA:
1—1.116 T. Williams
2—1.015 S. Musial
3—.970 J. DiMaggio
4—.961 J. Mize
5—.928 C. Keller
6—.915 M. Ott
7—.884 B. Johnson
8—.881 J. Heath
9—868 T. Henrich
10-.850 E. Slaughter
11-.840 R. Cullenbine

His election to the Hall of Merit appears to be imminent. Check it this coming Monday night.

Erik Bedard
03-26-2007, 02:16 PM
I'd like to nominate Roy Face. He was the second consistently great reliever, after Wilhelm. His 1962 season was truly outstanding, better than all of Wilhelm's except one. His 1957 season was amazing as well, and I don't think anybody meant as much to the Pirates in their 1960 WS run as Face did.

Freakshow
03-28-2007, 10:09 AM
His election to the Hall of Merit appears to be imminent. Check it this coming Monday night.
Keller did indeed gain election to the Hall of Merit, which now numbers 198 players and includes guys retiring before 1991.

Here's his plaque:

"Though a congenital back problem and maritime service during WWII cut short his career, “King Kong” still was able to climb the heights of baseball greatness as a member of possibly the finest outfield of all-time. Very muscular, the left-handed power hitter clubbed 30 or more home runs 3 times, drove in at least 100 runs 3 times, scored 100 or more runs three times, and slugged .518 for his career (with a hefty 152 OPS+). A patient hitter, he walked 100 or more times 5 times and left the game with a career OBP of .410. He was even more spectacular in the postseason, compiling a batting line of .306/.367/.611 (in his first World Series in 1939, Keller led all batters with his phenomenal batting line of .438/.471/1.188 and became the first rookie ever to slug 2 homers in a WS game). One of only a handful of hitters to have accomplished the feat of 20 HR, 20 2B and 10 3B in a season. Surprisingly fast despite his size, he was dependable out in the field (he led all left fielders in the AL 3 times in games). Member of four pennant-winners (1942 and the World Champions of 1939, 1941 and 1943). Four-time STATS, Inc. AL Outfielder (1941-43, 1946). Win Shares AL Silver Slugger Award (1943). Five-time All-Star (1940-41, 1943, 1946-47). AL leader for OPS (1943), BB (1940, 1943), Adj. OPS+ (1943), Power/Speed Number (1942-43) and AB/HR (1943)."

I'm still hoping someone else here can see what a great player he was and that he's very deserving of a ballot spot.

DoubleX
03-28-2007, 10:38 AM
Keller was a great player, but his career just wasn't nearly long enough for the Hall of Fame, IMO, even with adjustments for war credit. He basically had four or five seasons. Even if we given him war credit, which would be just two years, and assuming he was healthy and peak productive during that time, that's just 7 years. Not enough, IMO.

Freakshow
03-28-2007, 11:57 AM
Keller was a great player, but his career just wasn't nearly long enough for the Hall of Fame, IMO, even with adjustments for war credit. He basically had four or five seasons. Even if we given him war credit, which would be just two years, and assuming he was healthy and peak productive during that time, that's just 7 years. Not enough, IMO.
You have to look at his minor league play, as well. In 1937 he tore up the league in AAA with a year that translates to 28 win shares in MLB. The Yankees didn't need him, so they left him in the minors for 1938 and he was even better, putting up a season that translates to 30 win shares. I give him credit for 1938 when he was clearly of great major league value. The fact that he was forced to be great in the minors rather than MLB that year is not his fault.

So, essentially we have a player who was averaging more than 30 win shares per season (adjusted to 162 game seasons) from 1938 to 1946. That's more than enough for me to see him as a player who deserves serious consideration for the hall of fame.

Also, the two years he missed to the war were his age 27 and 28 years, so 30 win shares in those years is a conservative estimate.

Freakshow
03-28-2007, 01:10 PM
As this election winds down, it looks like Stan Hack has this year sewed up. I look for newbie Ken Boyer to battle Gordon for honors in 1993.

Freakshow
03-29-2007, 09:25 AM
Here are the results, in order, for the 1992 Mock VC election:

1919-1968 Votes Pct
Stan Hack 22 68.75% (elected)
Joe Gordon 19 59.38%
Gil Hodges 18 56.25%
Red Schoendienst 18 56.25%
Wes Ferrell 17 53.13%
Carl Mays 16 50.00%
Heinie Groh 12 37.50%
Billy Pierce 12 37.50%
Larry Doyle 11 34.38%
Gavy Cravath 10 31.25%
Tommy Bridges 9 28.13%
Al Rosen 9 28.13%
Vern Stephens 9 28.13%
Bucky Walters 9 28.13%
Rocky Colavito 8 25.00%
Tony Lazzeri 8 25.00%
Phil Rizzuto 8 25.00%
Bob Johnson 7 21.88%
Urban Shocker 7 21.88%
Lefty O'Doul 6 18.75%
Bob Elliott 5 15.63%
Roger Maris 5 15.63%
Wally Schang 5 15.63%
Joe Wood 5 15.63%
Elston Howard 4 12.50%
Don Newcombe 4 12.50%
Mickey Vernon 4 12.50%
Wally Berger 3 9.38%
Cecil Travis 3 9.38% (will not be on 1993 ballot)
Joe Adcock 2 6.25% (will not be on 1993 ballot)
Harvey Kuenn 2 6.25% (will not be on 1993 ballot)
Roy Sievers 2 6.25% (will not be on 1993 ballot)
Dick Groat 0 0.00% (will not be on 1993 ballot)


The average ballot had 8.72 names listed, up from 8.39. That seems like a pretty reasonable minimum to me; voters ought to be able to find eight guys worth supporting.

We have elected Stan Hack. Stan averaged 57% support in his six years on the ballot and his election is certainly well deserved. Let's keep focusing on the top guys. Among the top finishers, IMO at least four have impeccable cases for election.

There are five players here who will not be carried over to the 1993 ballot due to lack of support. These players may appear on future ballots, if someone raises them as candidates and they are seconded.