PDA

View Full Version : Agree or Disagree?


Williamsburg2599
02-08-2007, 02:04 PM
I almost gagged when I saw the title of this article:

Outdated Stadium should be history (http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/yankees/ny-sppow0201,0,2298593.column?coll=ny-sports-headlines)
January 31, 2007, 10:32 PM EST

It's never nice to speak ill about the ill, especially when death is apparent. With that in mind, I'll be kind and just say this: Yankee Stadium can't collapse fast enough.

Unfortunately, the Grim Reaper won't swing the wrecking ball until sometime in October 2008, depending on when Alex Rodriguez kills another playoff run. That's 21 months from now, or roughly the time between Carl Pavano starts. Until then, baseball fans must continue to root for the Yankees while sitting in a facility past its glory, which is sort of like taking Giselle Bundchen for a spin in a wheezing, old Coup de Ville.

Please, this is no disrespect to the history of the stadium itself.

Just the stadium itself.

Four million people visit Yankee Stadium every year to see Derek Jeter throw across his body to first base, to witness what $200 million buys these days in baseball talent, to observe the winningest team in baseball this decade.

Four million people do not visit Yankee Stadium to do a riverdance while standing in line for the three or four restrooms. Four million people do not visit Yankee Stadium to squeeze through aisles built for supermodels or fight for shouting space at concession stands the size of shopping-mall information booths. Four million people, or at least the few who dare to drive, do not visit Yankee Stadium hours before the first pitch just so they can find one of the limited parking spaces sold at monthly home mortgages.

Once you remove the product on the field and Monument Park in the outfield, the "Yankee experience" is like the death of Barbaro: overrated and overplayed.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, commissioner Bud Selig and other important types made it official yesterday when the All-Star Game was given to the Bronx in '08, but this was a mercy gesture, a nice way of being nice to a sick, suffering old cathedral that should've had the plug pulled a decade ago. Ordinarily, the Midseason Classic wouldn't come anywhere near Yankee Stadium, because baseball knows what we know: The place isn't fit for it.

The beauty of the Stadium nowadays lies exclusively with the history and tradition of the Yankees. People are attracted by walls that talk. They know this is where Babe Ruth smacked his 60th homer and where Don Larsen pitched his perfect World Series game. They want to press their ears close enough to hear the heavy heartbeats from Lou Gehrig's courageous speech and the Babe's good-bye.

They know they're standing in the same place where Roger Maris hit No. 61, where Aaron Boone needed one swing and where Reggie needed three. They also know this is where Joe Louis put Max Schmeling to sleep and where Chuck Bednarik did the same to Frank Gifford. A pair of popes blessed the crowd, and the end zone blessed Alan Ameche in the Greatest Game Ever Played.

All that history is so rich and rewarding and priceless in a building with the charm of Simon Cowell.

Despite getting more nips and tucks than the cast of "The View," the Stadium has seen better days. It can't compare to any of the grand old baseball buildings still standing. For sheer magnificence, nothing tops Dodger Stadium, still in all its retro 1960s glory, sitting atop Chavez Ravine. Wrigley Field also blows away Yankee Stadium, especially if you compare the neighborhoods that surround both ballparks. And Fenway Park, cozy and intimate and buffeted by the imposing Green Monster, is a more inviting place to waste a lazy afternoon.

Yankee Stadium would've gone long ago had George Steinbrenner not wasted time with his misguided attempt at building in Manhattan or flirting with New Jersey. Meanwhile, the cost of materials went up, to the point at which the price of the new Stadium in the Bronx will equal six Yankee payrolls. Well, if that's what it takes to move the Yankees into the 21st century and out of a dated building, so be it. Only three items are worth taking across the street to the new place. The arching façade, because it's the trademark. Monument Park, which deserves more space and a better presentation. And the roll call.

Well, there is something nice we can say about the old place.

It's not exactly Shea Stadium.

vtbub
02-08-2007, 02:08 PM
That's pathetic.

Signed,

Red Sox fan since 1975

bigtime39
02-08-2007, 02:45 PM
Absolutely agree. :clapping

PeteU
02-08-2007, 02:51 PM
Disagree--and this is coming from an Orioles fan who despises the Yankees with a passion. But there's history to that place, regardless of the 1976 renovation.

Maybe I'd be more inclined to agree if it was being replaced by a more worthy successor. But the plans for the New Yankee Stadium look awfully bland. I can barely tell it apart from New Cominskey Park.

2Chance
02-08-2007, 02:59 PM
One nice thiing about reading this while online:
at least I was sitting down.

Where do they get these people who have such a need to topple shrines?

Williamsburg2599
02-08-2007, 03:03 PM
One nice thiing about reading this while online:
at least I was sitting down.

Where do they get these people who have such a need to topple shrines?
My guess is as good as anybody else’s. That's like saying "the coliseum doesn't even have plumbing! Let's knock it down!":rolleyes:

Anyways, are they using a wrecking ball or an implosion? I can't decide which will be less painful to watch...

Knick9
02-08-2007, 03:07 PM
That article stinks. THE END.

POLO GROUNDS 1957
02-08-2007, 03:41 PM
Who ever wrote this article is a IDIOT.but if this article was about shea stadium i would agree with it 100 percent. i cant wait to see shea stadium come down.

Richmond Hill Phoenix
02-08-2007, 05:13 PM
I agree that the stadium isn't as awe-striking as it was pre-reno. But still, it's Yankee Stadium!!!

bigtime39
02-08-2007, 07:46 PM
My guess is as good as anybody else’s. That's like saying "the coliseum doesn't even have plumbing! Let's knock it down!":rolleyes:

Anyways, are they using a wrecking ball or an implosion? I can't decide which will be less painful to watch...

Can't sell it off piece by piece if you blow it up or knock it down. They're prepping the $teiner certificates for every brick, even as we write this...

bailiff
02-08-2007, 07:47 PM
Agree. The only thing going for it is that it's Yankee Stadium. Personally, for my money give me Minute Maid, Ameriquest, Dodger Stadium or Safeco over Yankee Stadium.

Disgruntaledmarinerfan
02-08-2007, 07:59 PM
Agree. Great article... finally some one speaks the truth.

milladrive
02-08-2007, 08:11 PM
I'm one of those who thinks thinks this article is pretty much on the money.

winningtheweapon
02-08-2007, 09:48 PM
I agree. Take away the Yankees, and the great players, then stick in the Devil Rays or Royals and then you sit there and try to convince me that that stadium is a mecca. It's an eye sore, and I'm glad it's going down. I express the same sentiments towards Shea as well.

POLO GROUNDS 1957
02-08-2007, 10:00 PM
I agree. Take away the Yankees, and the great players, then stick in the Devil Rays or Royals and then you sit there and try to convince me that that stadium is a mecca. It's an eye sore, and I'm glad it's going down. I express the same sentiments towards Shea as well.
You say that yankee stadium is a eye sore, have you ever been there in person. i have and its a great place to watch a game at.and i cant understand all of the yankee stadium bashing. its one of the greatest sports venues in history along with the polo grounds and ebbets field.

MattM
02-08-2007, 10:31 PM
That article was from NY Newsday right? Shaun Powell wrote it, and while I agree with him most of the time, I almost threw up when I read this. The only thing that I really got out of his article was that, alot of people considered Yankee Stadium "destroyed" when it was renovated after 73. The arches were gone, and the monuments which were in fair play, were moved. I still think this is the equivalent of tearing down the Roman Colisseum to many baseball fans, and historians. I just can't believe there hasn't been any uproar from ANY opponents of the new-stadium.

milladrive
02-08-2007, 10:37 PM
You say that yankee stadium is a eye sore, have you ever been there in person. i have and its a great place to watch a game at.and i cant understand all of the yankee stadium bashing. its one of the greatest sports venues in history along with the polo grounds and ebbets field.

I don't think the article bashed the Stadium. I think the writer merely called it as he sees it.

I've been to Yankee Stadium many times. I personally wouldn't say it's an eyesore, but I wouldn't call it a national monument either. It's a ballpark. A good old-fashioned ballpark. *shrug*

I even agree with the writer when he says it's a better stadium than Shea. Indeed, my butt doesn't hurt nearly as much after a game as it does at Shea. But its time has come, and I think the author put it in a good perspective.

Johnny Evers
02-09-2007, 02:38 PM
You say that yankee stadium is a eye sore, have you ever been there in person. i have and its a great place to watch a game at.and i cant understand all of the yankee stadium bashing. its one of the greatest sports venues in history along with the polo grounds and ebbets field.

You speak the truth. Yankee Stadium is an amazing place - and, personally, I don't think it looks too. There are a number of stadiums that are much uglier.

winningtheweapon
02-09-2007, 11:17 PM
You say that yankee stadium is a eye sore, have you ever been there in person. i have and its a great place to watch a game at.and i cant understand all of the yankee stadium bashing. its one of the greatest sports venues in history along with the polo grounds and ebbets field.

Yes, I have and it was a terrible experience. I won't even get into the lame NBA-like atmosphere inbetween innings since that isn't my point. You seemed to have missed my point where you replace the brand name that is the Yankees, with some franchise like the Devil Rays or the Royals. Is it a mecca still? Would you still complain about them tearing it down? I seriously doubt most would. Again, the argument is focused on the actual design of the stadium itself. Nobody is tarnishing or degrading the history that played out in that stadium.