Brian McKenna
07-11-2006, 07:42 AM
this stems from another conversation
please note that this is a historical discussion about the aagpbl not a thread blaming people for past injustices
prior to wwii female athletics were often referred to in derogatory terms and seen in an unflatteringly light by both men and women as a whole - tennis because of its "country club" appeal and the olympics may be the only ones that found a wide base of interest
this relegated other athletic pursuits to the background and often i have read old newspaper accounts which seem (reading between the lines) to deride females in competition as mere prostitutes or lesbians or at least in an unflattering light
my point is that it seems the aagpbl made a concerted effort to counter this public perception (or at least attempt to mitigate it), at least for their league - i never really thought about it but it would seem that they understood their market and made attempts (for their own benefit) to work within/around the perceptions
for example:
- the aagpbl tried to control their media reporting for the reasons listed above
- the ladies were presented in a decidedly feminine nature
- they were made to wear skirts to appear ladylike even in competition
- i'm sure they had a dress code
- they were made to take charm lessons
- chaperons were always present
i could be wrong in these perceptions or i may have missed some - what do you think?
can anyone expand on this? - i know some here have had interactions with the athletes themselves
please note that this is a historical discussion about the aagpbl not a thread blaming people for past injustices
prior to wwii female athletics were often referred to in derogatory terms and seen in an unflatteringly light by both men and women as a whole - tennis because of its "country club" appeal and the olympics may be the only ones that found a wide base of interest
this relegated other athletic pursuits to the background and often i have read old newspaper accounts which seem (reading between the lines) to deride females in competition as mere prostitutes or lesbians or at least in an unflattering light
my point is that it seems the aagpbl made a concerted effort to counter this public perception (or at least attempt to mitigate it), at least for their league - i never really thought about it but it would seem that they understood their market and made attempts (for their own benefit) to work within/around the perceptions
for example:
- the aagpbl tried to control their media reporting for the reasons listed above
- the ladies were presented in a decidedly feminine nature
- they were made to wear skirts to appear ladylike even in competition
- i'm sure they had a dress code
- they were made to take charm lessons
- chaperons were always present
i could be wrong in these perceptions or i may have missed some - what do you think?
can anyone expand on this? - i know some here have had interactions with the athletes themselves