Smoltz Not Opening Day Starter

[PureBaseballFan]

From an article on atlantabraves.com it says Hudson will be the #1 starter not Smoltz. http://atlanta.braves.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060228&content_id=1327623&vkey=news_atl&fext=.jsp&c_id=atl

[jpenrod]

Article 1 (http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/0227hudson.html)

Article 2 (http://www.ajc.com/braves/content/sports/braves/stories/0228notes.html)

[wilkerson_rulz-06]

Why?:noidea

[AJsBraves]

I have absloutly no problem with huddy starting opening day.

[jpenrod]

Why?:noidea


If you read the articles I linked you would have your answer, but just in case you can not use the links. Basically they want huddy to carry more of the load this season so Smoltz can reduce his innings and not run into the problem he had last year. The idea of moving him to #2 is it will be easier for Cox to skip him in the rotation when the schedule allows it giving his arm some rest.

[Atlanta Braves Freak]

I think Smoltz will be more effective as a #2 than as the primary man, he'll have more rest and win more games.

[jpenrod]

I think Smoltz will be more effective as a #2 than as the primary man, he'll have more rest and win more games.

He will win more games if the pen does not blow 30% of the games he is winning

[KCGHOST]

It doesn't matter to me who is the Opening Day starter. And the logic that designating Hudson as the #1 starter makes it easier for the Braves to rest Smoltz simply escapes me.

[Atlanta Braves Freak]

He will win more games if the pen does not blow 30% of the games he is winning

Same is true for Hudson, he could have won about 5 more games if the pen hadn't blown games. His biggest "freshie" was the NLDS game against the Astros.