PDA

View Full Version : More records (Biggio & Bagwell)


nolanryan5714
05-02-2005, 09:29 PM
Tonight, we saw 3 important milestones:

1. Biggio reached the #60 spot on the all-time hit list.
2. Biggio stole his 400th stolen base.
3. Bagwell walked for the 1,400th time.

History seems to be in the making virtually every time those two and Clemens play! :cool:

barzilla
05-03-2005, 06:04 AM
David,

Another record they have to watch out for every time they play together is that Bagwell has driven in Biggio more often than any other tandem in baseball history. When you think of the famous dynamic duos in history, that is pretty impressive.

PopTop
05-03-2005, 01:37 PM
Good catch, Scott, on the RBI note.

Bidge is simply amazing as far as I'm concerned. :gt

barzilla
05-03-2005, 01:59 PM
I have a feeling none of us will truly appreciate these guys until we have an opportunity to look back on their careers with some perspective. One thing that is sad about these guys is that they have never been given the love they disappear because people in the press (and on boards like this) have focused on the negatives. Consider the following:

1) When they were in their primes (1992-1999) people focused on their inability to produce in the post-season or get to the post-season (in some cases). In both cases, the problems centered around either bad luck or lack of support in the lineup.

2) Currently, these players are seen as clogging up the pipeline in terms of money and younger players ability to play. I am guilty of this one for sure and its hard not to be. You have two players that take up 20 million of a 80 million payroll, but they don't produce anywhere near that level anymore. Plus, you have the likes of Lance Berkman (who should move to first) and Chris Burke (who should be at second) having to wait their turn.

Keeping these things in mind, I have been working on my third book. Essentially, it is a project using metrics to evaluate the games' best players (similar to Bill James' Historical Abstracts but modernized and more consistently focused). Agents have turned down my efforts to do one on Hall of Fame selection process, so I'm shortening it to include the top ten at every position. Biggio and Bagwell are in the top ten at their position. If you look at their numbers in the late 1990s it is amazing.

nolanryan5714
05-03-2005, 03:38 PM
Good post there, Scott. I agree with almost everything you said.

However, I have a few comments on this part:
2) Currently, these players are seen as clogging up the pipeline in terms of money and younger players ability to play. I am guilty of this one for sure and its hard not to be. You have two players that take up 20 million of a 80 million payroll, but they don't produce anywhere near that level anymore. Plus, you have the likes of Lance Berkman (who should move to first) and Chris Burke (who should be at second) having to wait their turn.

Yes, many see them as "clogging" the lineup - but the results would be dire if you replaced them right now in the way you think they should.
-Burke at second? He has had quite a bit of playing time already, and is yet to become a full-time big leaguer.
-Berkman at first? That means Bagwell, who is still a production player, is OUT. He can't play any other position, period. Biggio at least could move back to the outfield, but if we're playing the hypothetical "minus Bags and Bidge" game here, then you must assume Luke Scott would play outfield...and he isn't playing very impressively, either.

You have to believe in Biggio and Bagwell for at least another season. We don't have any good alternatives, and the way Biggio is playing, I wouldn't want him to move anywhere anyway.
I'm sure Bagwell will hit 25-30 homers again this year, so keep him playing too!

barzilla
05-03-2005, 06:20 PM
Yes, many see them as "clogging" the lineup - but the results would be dire if you replaced them right now in the way you think they should.

David,

You need to read my second book. (I love shameless plugs) The Seattle Mariners became better when they let Griffey, Rodriguez, and Johnson go for two reasons.

1) They got players for two of them that ended up contributing. Mike Cameron, Freddy Garcia, and Carlos Guillen all ended up being solid contributors at those positions. They did not equal those guys numbers, but they did enough.

2) This is the most important one right here. They used the excess money to acquire players that helped their club in other areas.

When you're thinking about a roster, you think about it in terms of 25 pieces rather than one or two specific pieces. Would Chris Burke be better than Biggio? I'm not sure, I think he would be better defensively and would put up some offensive numbers, but the important thing is that he is cheap. Therefore, you would have nearly all of that twenty million to get an outfielder to replace Berkman. Then, you have other money to improve other areas of the club. Therefore, you are better off overall.

nolanryan5714
05-03-2005, 10:21 PM
I see what you're saying, Scott...but, with a couple of exceptions across the league, I don't think ANYONE would dare give the bench to Biggio for Burke. Biggio is just WAY too hot right now!
After tonight's 3-4 game, he is up to .309 with 3 homers, 10 doubles, and 14 ribbies. 39 years old? What??? ;)

Also, when it comes to monetary issues on Biggs and Bags, don't forget that they were underpaid for their "prime" years, so this could be considered back payment (especially for Jeff!).
In addition, Craig took a pay CUT (don't remember the exact amount) just so he could stay with the club...that's unheard of these days, as you know!


I want the 2 big vets to stay out there and play their hearts out. :)

barzilla
05-04-2005, 06:13 AM
David,

Now that they're here you have to play them. With Biggio I would give him a mandatory day off per week. Last season he did this in April, May, and June and then started to fade. At 39 he is not a 155-160 game player anymore, but at 130 games he might be able to maintain his current level of production. I think we can all agree he is playing great ball right now. I just want him to continue playing that kind of ball in August and September. Giving him consistent rest is how you do it.

strosfan
05-04-2005, 10:49 AM
Also, when it comes to monetary issues on Biggs and Bags, don't forget that they were underpaid for their "prime" years, so this could be considered back payment (especially for Jeff!).
In addition, Craig took a pay CUT (don't remember the exact amount) just so he could stay with the club...that's unheard of these days, as you know!


People just don't understand that BOTH of them restructured their contracts in order to get players on the team. They agreed to get paid less now and more later. This was back in the 90's in order to get Caminiti, Kile, Randy Johnson, for example, they did what was best for the "team". Other ballplayers don't do that. I, for one, appreciate them every day and will be heart-broken when they play their last game. I couldn't be prouder to have those two on our team.

Robert
05-04-2005, 12:11 PM
I know!!! Biggio and Bagwell are what makes the Astros, THE Astros of the 90's and the Millenium. They are THE Killer B's, and there will never be a pair like them two.

I have been a Astros fan since 1996, can you name one player on the Astros now, that was an Astro in 1996? I can only name 2 :)

Chris Burke is young, keep in mind, and will get his fair share of playing time in the Outfield, pinch hitting, filling in for Craig on Days off, he'll develop. Same with any other player, unless they are hot, like Willy Taveras who is just, well, just very good at this point. Luke Scott and Chris Burke will find that spark, and bloom perfectly, just wait a year or two.

nolanryan5714
05-05-2005, 01:49 AM
Welcome, Robert! :)

It's great to have you and your input here. We all hope you will continue to contribute... :gt

P.S. - guys, I won't be around to contribute for several days after 05-05-05, so let's hope we kick the CRAP outta the Braves and Marlins! :evil

(Number 5 is my favorite number...maybe it'll bring us some luck!)

barzilla
05-05-2005, 06:14 AM
David,

Are you predicting some incapcitation after Cinco de Mayo? :laugh

Berkman is coming back this weekend, so life will be better and hopefully the illness bug is leaving. However, last night Bagwell was out of the lineup for the first time in his career because of shoulder soreness. This is not a good sign.

One of the reasons I go the other way on Biggio and Bagwell that most of you do is I like to see guys retire on top or near the top of their game. I hate to see people hang on to get certain numbers. I want to remember both for being the great players they were. If this is going to dehibilitate Bagwell to the point where he can't be himself he will bow out gracefully after the season.

strosfan
05-05-2005, 08:27 AM
I was listening to Richard Justice, writer for the Chronicle, yesterday on the radio concerning Bagwell. Bedsides crediting Bagwell for being the most honest person you'd ever want to meet; bagwell has been having meetings with front office about his shoulder problems and has flat-out told them that he will NOT embarass this ball club. He is the heart and soul of that clubhouse and teammates speak very highly of him.

The guy can still play and more importantly - he still wants to play. As long as he can continue to contribute, stop trying to end his career. His shoulder will do that for him soon enough.

barzilla
05-05-2005, 10:25 AM
The guy can still play and more importantly - he still wants to play. As long as he can continue to contribute, stop trying to end his career. His shoulder will do that for him soon enough

It's good to see he's having meetings with management. I never said he should retire now. I said he should retire if his shoulder incapcitates him (or diminishes him a great deal). He is not the player that hit 40+ homers and walked 120 times a season, but he is on a pace to walk 90+ times this year and hit around 20-25 home runs. If he does that I have no problem with him finishing out his contract because he is still productive.

Listen, when I think about him hanging it up it isn't out of a desire to get rid of him, but to see him retire near the top. The last thing we want to see is a Willie Mays from 1973 out there. Bagwell is one of the top five first baseman of all-time and he deserves to be remembered that way.

I'm reminded of a story I read in Bill James Historical Abstract. It seems that Lou Gehrig knew it was time to end his streak in 1939 when Tony Lazzeri and Bill Dickey patted him on the back after a play he deemed to be routine. Just like Gehrig, Bagwell has a dehabilitating condition that will drive him out of the game eventually. Only Bagwell knows how much pain he is in and how much the condition limits him. Like Gehrig, it will only get worse. The question with all living legends is exactly when to hang it up. Jim Brown and Barry Sanders left a lot on the field, but guys like Gehrig, Nolan Ryan, and Hakeem Olajuwon would have been better off hanging it up the season before. The question Bagwell (and Biggio and Clemens) face is exactly when that right time is. I simply believe that more heroes retire too late than too early. I am more saddened by the former than the later.

Hammerin Hank
05-07-2005, 03:03 AM
Yesterday against the Braves, Craig Biggio scored his 1621st career run, passing Roger Connor for 36th all time.

The Commissioner
05-07-2005, 10:59 PM
David,

Another record they have to watch out for every time they play together is that Bagwell has driven in Biggio more often than any other tandem in baseball history. When you think of the famous dynamic duos in history, that is pretty impressive.

Wow, that's fascinating!!! I've never even heard that stat before. I don't suppose you happen to have the numbers on that and/or the other top tandems?

barzilla
05-08-2005, 04:36 PM
Wow, that's fascinating!!! I've never even heard that stat before. I don't suppose you happen to have the numbers on that and/or the other top tandems?

Actually I don't. I want to say it's something close to 1000 but I could be wrong. It was announced during an Astros broadcast a couple of years ago. Thinking back its really not as impressive as it seems. Biggio and Bagwell have been together since 1991 and both enjoyed their primes at the same time. When you think about it, very few other tandems played as long together during their primes as Biggio and Bagwell. It is as much serendipity as it is skill.

The Commissioner
05-08-2005, 11:11 PM
Thinking back its really not as impressive as it seems. Biggio and Bagwell have been together since 1991 and both enjoyed their primes at the same time. When you think about it, very few other tandems played as long together during their primes as Biggio and Bagwell. It is as much serendipity as it is skill.


I agree that a lot of it is luck, but I would also venture to say if someone has a list of the top five or top ten, you're talking about almost all Hall of Famers or Hall of Famer caliber players. Regardless, I just think it's a neat stat. It may be mostly meaningless, but still just interesting to see.

Robert
05-11-2005, 10:36 AM
Actually I don't. I want to say it's something close to 1000 but I could be wrong. It was announced during an Astros broadcast a couple of years ago. Thinking back its really not as impressive as it seems. Biggio and Bagwell have been together since 1991 and both enjoyed their primes at the same time. When you think about it, very few other tandems played as long together during their primes as Biggio and Bagwell. It is as much serendipity as it is skill.

Driven in Biggio 1000 times? That's way off, It's more like 300 if anything :P

barzilla
05-11-2005, 02:38 PM
Driven in Biggio 1000 times? That's way off, It's more like 300 if anything :P

You're probably right. 400-500 seems a lot more reasonable, but it is a ludicrous number whichever one it is. I can't remember the exact number because it is one of those RAS (random ass stats) that they throw out there every now and then.

nolanryan5714
05-12-2005, 09:20 PM
Biggio led off tonight's game against the Giants with a homer, adding to his N.L. record for leadoffs. He now has 42.
(BTW, he hit 2 homers in the game.)

strosfan
05-13-2005, 10:59 AM
Biggio led off tonight's game against the Giants with a homer, adding to his N.L. record for leadoffs. He now has 42.
(BTW, he hit 2 homers in the game.)


Just when I think I can't be any more amazed at his efforts... :clapping

Hammerin Hank
05-13-2005, 10:34 PM
Yesterday against the Giants, Craig Biggio scored his 1623rd career run, passing Al Kaline for 35th all time.

BagwellFan
05-13-2005, 10:44 PM
Wow, that's fascinating!!! I've never even heard that stat before. I don't suppose you happen to have the numbers on that and/or the other top tandems?

I first heard this statistic durring a broadcast several years ago, but I vaugly remember it being mentioned sometime last year. If memory serves I think it was in the ballpark of 38% of Bagwell's RBIs are Biggio scoring. If my number is correct, that means Biggio has scored because of Bagwell about 580 times. Talk about an impressive figure.

Hammerin Hank
08-07-2005, 11:12 AM
On July 28 against the Mets, Craig had his 9590th career at bat, passing Nap Lajoie for 31st all time.

PopTop
08-07-2005, 02:53 PM
Bidge is currently 46th on the all-time hit parade with 2746...needs three to tie Luke Appling for 45th.

He's been sitting in 13th on the doubles chart for a while now with 594, and needs 9 to tie Cal Ripken for 12th.

With 1669 runs scored, he sits in a dead heat with Dave Winfield for 27th all-time. Eight more will tie him with Mickey Mantle on the next rung up.

And Biggio has 407 stolen bases which puts him in a tie for 62nd all-time with Chuck Knoblauch. Tommy Harper sits one ahead of that duo.

Hammerin Hank
08-11-2005, 07:35 AM
Yesterday against the Nationals, Craig scored his 1670th career run, passing Dave winfield for 27th all time.

Hammerin Hank
08-14-2005, 03:35 PM
Yesterday against the Pirates, Craig had his 9646th career at bat, passing Vada Pinson for 30th all time.

Mikie
08-22-2005, 03:26 PM
I've just wandered across this site and am browsing around, interesting to read the sentiments from May now that it's August! To continue the recent part of the thread, as all of you 'Stros fans know Bidge tied Mickey Mantle (that other #7) in runs scored AND none other than Ernie Banks in games played, both last night.

Back to the early part of the thread, my take on Bags and Bidge can be biased, I admit, but look at what Baggy has gone through for the team, and whoever said Biggio is making $20 million hasn't been paying attention, he made $3 million last year and his option was picked up for the same this year....compare with Scott Spiezio, recently released from Seattle, making the same money. I'll take what Bidge has brought to the table the past two years any day, and so would most teams, in fact, half of them would kill for the chance. Burke (who had his career game so far last night) is still more part of the future than he is the present; when he starts showing up every day like Taveras and Lane, not to mention Ensberg and Everett, then he can begin fitting into Biggio's shoes.

PopTop
08-23-2005, 08:06 AM
Welcome to Baseball Fever, MikieNix :waving

It's been an absolute privilege to have seen Biggio play in an Astros uniform all these years. A real shame there aren't more players like him in the big leagues.

Mikie
08-23-2005, 11:15 AM
Welcome to Baseball Fever, MikieNix :waving

It's been an absolute privilege to have seen Biggio play in an Astros uniform all these years. A real shame there aren't more players like him in the big leagues.

Thanks, I'm enjoying looking around, nice to see the SABR slant, not to mention some Astros diehards. I'm a regular reader of your site, BTW, have been for years, you've even published a few of my stories about taking my little brother-in-law to games, thanks again for that.

Biggio has been my favorite player since the first time I saw him play as a rookie catcher late in 1988, leading off no less - I played 3rd and led off and had a reputation for getting dirty when I played, so I had a natural affinity for the guy. I'm constantly amazed at how many so-called baseball people aren't aware of how unique his accomplishments are, never mind how high they rank with the all-time best, and how many still consider him a "borderline" HOF'er - give me a break, the day he retires I'm going to count ahead 5 years and make my reservations for Cooperstown!

When I hear the fair weather fans around here (I'm in Houston) start blasting him for being over the hill, needs to make room for the youth, etc., etc., I just shake my head. Then I pull up the stats of current MLB 2B-men and note where he stands, then point out that the names he's passing on these all-time lists every time he steps on the field are outfielders, fer chrissakes, and not just the also-rans but good ones with long, successful careers.

We've been blessed to watch the tandem of Biggio and Bagwell for so long, that's for sure. In general, we've got a wonderfully stable franchise, which derives from the economics as much as anything, but the fact that we're also successful says a lot, I'm not sure I could watch a team (like, say, the Rangers) that changes the significant faces every year or two with the same results. It's obvious that the team is evolving into the post-Bags'n'Bidge era, and while it's true we still haven't seen a pennant I'll never give up, heck, who knows what this October might bring!

Hammerin Hank
05-30-2006, 04:36 AM
Yesterday against the Cardinals, Craig recorded his 10000th career at bat. He's only the 24th player to reach this milestone, and has the most at bats of any active player.

On another note, Lance Berkman also recorded his 1000th career hit in the same game.

Hammerin Hank
05-31-2006, 03:48 AM
Yesterday against the Cardinals, Craig had his 2849th career hit, passing Brooks Robinson for 40th all time.

Hammerin Hank
06-01-2006, 02:16 AM
Yesterday against the Cardinals, Craig had his 10007th career at bat, passing Frank Robinson for 23rd all time. He needs 71 more to pass Rabbit Maranville and reach 22nd all time.

Hammerin Hank
06-05-2006, 06:49 PM
Friday against the Reds, Craig played in his 2617th career game, passing Lou Brock for 32nd all time. Also, in the same game, he had his 2851st career hit, passing Jesse Burkett for 39th all time.

Yesterday, against the Reds again, Craig had his 625 career double, passing Hank Aaron for 9th all time.

PopTop
06-09-2006, 12:27 PM
You can keep track of several columns for Biggio real easy over at AstrosDaily.com.

Hammerin Hank
06-10-2006, 12:12 PM
Yesterday against the Braves, Craig Biggio scored his 1730th career run, passing Jim O'Rourke for 21st all time.

Hammerin Hank
06-17-2006, 10:57 AM
Yesterday against the Royals, Craig played in his 2628th career game, passing Andre Dawson for 31st all time.

nolanryan5714
06-30-2007, 01:03 AM
BUMP, for a really info-packed thread.

Yeah, listen to Pop - Astrosdaily.com is great. Shameless backing plug. ;)


Let's see....Biggio just hit a couple or so more than 3,000 (career), so that should be on the list.

Rin3n
11-26-2007, 12:32 PM
Bagwell knocked in Biggio a lot. But what about the other way around? How many times did Biggio knock in Bagwell? Anyone have those numbers?