PDA

View Full Version : Polo Grounds Seating Chart


dadair6
01-19-2004, 04:47 PM
If I'm posting this in the wrong forum, I apoligize.

I recently acquired a ticket stub from the Polo Grounds for a game in 1953. Being from Detroit and nowhere near old enough to have ever gone to a game there, I don't know the section configuration. I've looked all over the 'Net for a seating chart to see where the seat was located, but haven't had any luck finding one.

If someone could point me in the right direction to find one, or happens to have one, I'd really appreciate it.

Thanks

Sashag
01-19-2004, 10:06 PM
i have done some research and recommend the following sites:

http://baseball-almanac.com/stadium/st_polo.shtml

http://www.ballparksofbaseball.com/past/PoloGrounds.htm

http://www.baseball-links.com/

dadair6
01-20-2004, 10:42 AM
Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried those and none have a seating chart. My last option is to contact the Hall of Fame, but their website says wait 8-10 weeks for a response.

bluezebra
01-20-2004, 11:41 AM
Contact the City of New York and the San Francisco Giants. They mave have that info in their archives.

I have a picture in a book from the 1920s that shows the trajectory of a 560 foot home run that Babe Ruth hit.

Bob

Sashag
01-20-2004, 12:38 PM
Although the site says 8-10 weeks, chances are the research Dept will respond quicker than that. I emailed them the other day and got a reply in like 2 days. They are your best bet though. -Sasha

Greenpeach
01-20-2004, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Sashag
Although the site says 8-10 weeks, chances are the research Dept will respond quicker than that. I emailed them the other day and got a reply in like 2 days. They are your best bet though. -Sasha

Have you tried to contact the NY Mets ? They me able to help you out.

dadair6
01-21-2004, 08:36 AM
Thanks for everyone's help. I've contacted the Hall and I'm waiting for a response. If they can't help, then I'll try contacting the Mets and Giants PR departments. This is turning into a ton of work!:D

Greenpeach
01-21-2004, 10:30 AM
Originally posted by dadair6
Thanks for everyone's help. I've contacted the Hall and I'm waiting for a response. If they can't help, then I'll try contacting the Mets and Giants PR departments. This is turning into a ton of work!:D

I looked through some old baseball yearbooks that I had last night. A 1963 LA Dodgers yearbook had a diagram of the Polo Grounds (Home of the Mets) in the back of the book, but no seating chart. I would assume any old New York Giants program or yearbook would have the info you desire. Good luck in your search.

Sashag
01-21-2004, 02:07 PM
dadair6,

Please let us know what you come up with and I would be interested in knowing how fast the Hall responds. -Sasha

dadair6
01-26-2004, 06:53 AM
I received a response from the Hall on Friday, only three days after I contacted them. They are mailing me a copy they have on file.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

Darryl

Seattle1
10-07-2006, 08:45 PM
I received a response from the Hall on Friday, only three days after I contacted them. They are mailing me a copy they have on file.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

Darryl

If they can't help you, I bet Polo Grounds 1957 can recite the seating chart by heart for you!

POLO GROUNDS 1957
10-07-2006, 08:51 PM
Here is a seating chart for the polo grounds. with this you should be able to find out the location of the ticket stub.

-Kyle-
10-07-2006, 08:55 PM
I would never have sat in section 4, looks awful.

POLO GROUNDS 1957
10-07-2006, 08:56 PM
I would never have sat in section 4, looks awful.
I would have no problem in sitting in section 4 of the polo grounds. i sat in many seats like those in tiger stadium and old comiskey park and enjoyed the game.

riverfrontier
10-09-2006, 06:26 AM
I always imagine the Polo Grounds to be a slightly quirkier version of Tiger Stadium. Which it was, basically.

StanTheMan
10-10-2006, 05:26 PM
I always imagine the Polo Grounds to be a slightly quirkier version of Tiger Stadium. Which it was, basically.

Hmmmm.... I can't say that I have done much research on Tiger Stadium, other than Green Cathedrals, Sporting News Take Me Out to the Ballpark, and I have an Amadee print of Tiger Stadium like those found in the Sporting News Book (have the whole set actually)

But to say the PG was a quirky version of any other ballpark is a bit shortsided.

The PG was incredibly unique, and not only were a few pieces of Americana/Baseball History produced there (the name HOT DOG was coined, Foul Pole Screens were first used, the Umps were "miked" and tied into the PA system for the first time, the first ever walk off HR to end a playoff or Series Game) and the outageous dimensions of the park itself produced a brand of baseball which has really never been equalled, IMO.

For instance, the PG had the highest frequency of Home Runs of any park of all time until Coors Field was built. But the PG was no whiffle ball field. In terms of runs scored, it was actually VERY neutral (meaning plenty of parks prduced more total runs, plenty of parks produced less).

So if you were sitting in Section 4... ;)

You were very likely to see a HR, but scores of games at the PG were normal. In fact, any player in the big leagues had HR power at the PG, if he hit it down the line. About 20-30% of the outfield was reacheable for anyone, but the rest of the park took a tremendous shot to reach the seats. Power alleys, where the bullpens were located (yes, the only FAIR TERRITORY bullpens in baseball) were about 450 feet from home plate. There wer basically in what would be the power alleys in other parks. Deepest left and right center were even farther away. And of course the famous 483 ft sign in dead center.

Only Four Men ever hit a HR to the Center Field Bleachers, and no batted ball ever struck the clubhouse. Because of the short distance down the lines, outfielders played very close together. Not only could you hit a 470 foot out, but you could also rip one into the gap, and have it caught for an out due to the outfielders being close together. Then your pitcher makes a mistake inside to a weak hitter, and he gets a 280 foot home run. More than one player hit his ONLY career HR at the PG.

But it was not always a boon to HR hitters. Babe Ruth's Yankees played three seasons at the PG. 1920-22. He hit 75 HR's at the PG, and 73 on the Road, with only 10 fewer at bats at the PG. Mays hit 94 HR's at home in the PG, and 93 on the road as a New York Giant.

It must have been fascinating to watch a game there. Absolutely anything could happen on ANY pitch, to any batter. Inside the park HR's were more common, due to the deep fences. The fans were passionate, the Giants teams often very good, etc. Pitching inside must have been scary as he11 for the pitchers.

The legendary PG deserves a more prestigious place in history, IMO.

RichardLillard1
10-10-2006, 07:49 PM
Great post Stan I couldn't have said it better myself.

Its also interesting to note that had section 4 existed when Ruth played there during the Yankees tennancy that a home run to that area could have been seen a few times. Ruth was the first person to ever clear the right field roof and by examining the type of hitter he was we know that he hit to the power alleys and more twards center than right most of the time.

That's not to say that the Polo Grounds didn't help his number of 450+ foot fly outs, with those dimmensions that park could have been his best friend and worst enemy every time he stepped into the box.

bigtime39
10-11-2006, 11:52 AM
Looks like it was designed perfectly...for football! :laugh

runningshoes
10-11-2006, 12:37 PM
Looks like it was designed perfectly...for football! :laugh

Or polo, perhaps?

riverfrontier
10-11-2006, 02:30 PM
I'm familiar with lots of oft-repeated, archival facts about the Polo Grounds. Thanks for even more. It helps with all the mental imagery. Anyway, what I meant about Tiger Stadium and the Polo Grounds could be extended to Shibe Park too, I guess, but I never got to see it. And it was never fully enclosed. If I want to imagine a fully functional, 50's era Polo Grounds, I imagine Tiger Stadium, with a slightly deeper center field, and quirky alleys. The ambience is what I was trying to get across. The feeling of a cavernous, dark under-bellied park with upper deck all around you, and posts supporting the cheaper seats. A roof running around the whole park, excepting center field. If I imagine Forbes Field, I imagine Wrigley, with quirks. But balls on bats would never echo in parks like that. It's a different kind of park.
Much like parks today, if you've seen one, you're in heaven. If you've seen two, you're getting a mental picture of what you haven't seen. If you've been to Coors Field, and you only seen a picture of Jacobs Ladder, you'll get the picture. If you've only been to Fenway, but not Wrigley, imagine Crosley Field. When you see Boston or Chicago, you'll be in Cincinnati.

StanTheMan
10-11-2006, 04:35 PM
If I want to imagine a fully functional, 50's era Polo Grounds, I imagine Tiger Stadium, with a slightly deeper center field, and quirky alleys. The ambience is what I was trying to get across. The feeling of a cavernous, dark under-bellied park with upper deck all around you, and posts supporting the cheaper seats. A roof running around the whole park, excepting center field. If I imagine Forbes Field, I imagine Wrigley, with quirks.


That makes a lot of sense, and I fully understand what you are getting at.

I do, however, sometimes spring my keyboard into action when the topic of the PG comes up.... and occassionally I do so without thinking first...... it's a character flaw, I suppose.

Just make sure you never post along the lines that the PG was old, run down, and just had to go by the time the wrecking ball hit it. Polo Grounds 1957 will show up at your door, your will find your tires deflated next time you park anywhere, you will get an audit from the IRA every year, you will lose your car keys immediately (or did he take them?) and all kinds of bad stuff will happen to you..... :D

For those who want to learn more about the PG, Stew Thornley's book, "The Land of the Giants" is excellent.

I am also about halfway through a newly released book, "The Echoing Green," by Joshua Prager, which is the "untold" store of Bobby Thomson's Shot Heard round the world. The Giants were absolutely stealing signs through the use of a Center Field Clubhouse spy with a powerful telescope, and using a buzzer/vibrating bullpen phone to get the signal to the batter...... interesting indeed. There is a photo in the book of Thomson's HR in flight, and a faint shadow can be seen in the 4th window of the Clubhouse, which was manager Durocher's office. There is also a team photo from 1951 (taken with the 483 foot sign and the clubhouse as a background to the team) in which a section of the protective wire over the 4th window had been cut away, just enough for a telescope to comfortably see through.....

There is certainly more to the claim however, such as players admitting it, clubhouse boys, and sons of players and team officials, who are alive today, who stated that they knew about it, etc.

Ironically, the electrician who installed the buzzer system (who also was the electrician who worked the lights for the night games) was a lifelong Dodger fan. In the book, he is deathly ill with Cancer, and I am not sure yet if he was alive to hear of Thompson's homer beating his beloved Bums.

If you look at the chart above, Thomson's HR landed in the lower deck of section 35. Just a few rows in.

Long live the PG

Seattle1
11-19-2006, 11:58 AM
The one think I don't like about the Polo Grounds is the way players could hit "cheap" home runs just by pulling a shot down the left or right field lines. Sort of the same thing when they converted the Los Angeles Collesium to a baseball field, down the left field line anyway. What was that one, like 225 feet.

Elvis
11-19-2006, 12:02 PM
The one think I don't like about the Polo Grounds is the way players could hit "cheap" home runs just by pulling a shot down the left or right field lines. Sort of the same thing when they converted the Los Angeles Collesium to a baseball field, down the left field line anyway. What was that one, like 225 feet.

251 ft. down the LF line. As far as cheap home runs, who's to say which is cheaper: a 279 ft line or a 360 ft power alley.

Seattle1
11-20-2006, 06:39 PM
251 ft. down the LF line. As far as cheap home runs, who's to say which is cheaper: a 279 ft line or a 360 ft power alley.

Hmmm, I guess I like at least 325 down the lines, at least 380-385 in the power alleys, and 400+ in CF. What would you say your minimum for power alleys is?

The Real McCoy
11-21-2006, 01:31 PM
Only Four Men ever hit a HR to the Center Field Bleachers,

In the interest of full disclosure or possibly just adding a bit of persepective: of the four hitters, two, Hank Aaron and Lou Brock accomplished the feat on cosectutive days in 1962. That, of course, was the inaugural year of the New York Metropolitans, a team and a annus mirabilis immortalized by Jimmy Breslin in his wonderful book, "Can't Anyone Here Play This Game."

I will leave it to the good office and judgement of this assemblage whether to asterik those two shots given the state of the home nine's pitching staff.